UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant:  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

x Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
¨ Definitive Proxy Statement
¨ Definitive Additional Materials
¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

Geospace Technologies Corporation

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x No fee required.
¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
 1. 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 2. 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 3. 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11:

 

 4. 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 5. 

Total fee paid:

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
 1. 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 2. 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 3. 

Filing Party:

 

 4. 

Date Filed:

 


PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT—SUBJECT TO COMPLETION

DATED JULY 11, 2013DECEMBER 12, 2014

 

LOGO

July [    ], 2013January 7, 2015

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

In connection with our previously scheduled special meeting of stockholdersI am pleased to be held July 16, 2013, one of our stockholders filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint alleged that our prior proxy statement materials, dated June 21, 2013, impermissibly bundled two distinct proposals into one proposal for consideration by our stockholders. While the Company continuesinvite you to believe that its prior presentation of a single proposal was consistent with the applicable rules, the Company has decided to re-solicit the proxies of our stockholders to give our stockholders the opportunity to vote on two separate proposals, and to explain the ramifications of the various options presented. To allow sufficient time for stockholders to consider and vote on the Company’s new proposals, we have postponed the Specialattend Geospace Technologies Corporation’s 2015 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Geospace Technologies Corporation.Stockholders. We will hold the meeting at 9:00 a.m. on August [    ], 2013the 12th of February 2015 at our corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive,the Crowne Plaza Houston Northwest Brookhollow, 12801 Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77040-6601.77040.

Following this letter you will find the formal Notice of Meeting and a proxy statement which describes the action to be taken at the meeting. We have enclosed aBLUE proxy card so that you may grant your proxy to be voted as you indicate. TheWe have also enclosed proxy card is blue in ordera copy of our 2014 Annual Report. We encourage you to differentiate it from the white proxy card you previously received from us in connection with our previously scheduled special meeting of stockholders that was to be held July 16, 2013.read these materials.

Your vote is important.Please complete and mail your BLUE proxy card promptly, whether or not you plan to attend the specialannual meeting. If you attend the meeting you may vote in person even if you have mailed a signed and dated proxy. Proxies may also be submitted electronically through Internet voting or telephonically. Instructions for telephonic or electronic voting can be found at http://materials.proxyvote.com/37364X.www.edocumentview.com/geos.

In addition to solicitation by use of the mails, certain of our officers and employees may solicit the return of proxies personally or by telephone, electronic mail or facsimile. The cost of any solicitation of proxies will be borne by us.

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote (i) FOR the amendmentelection of directors, (ii) FOR the ratification of the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Planappointment by the audit committee of the Board of Directors of BDO USA, LLP, independent public accountants, as our auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, (iii) FOR the approval of the non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of Geospace Technologies Corporation’s named executive officers, and (ii)(iv) FORratification the approval of certain stock options issued under the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan.reincorporation of Geospace Technologies Corporation.

Thank you for your cooperation. The rest of the Board of Directors and I look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

 

Very truly yours,

/s/ Gary D. Owens

Gary D. OwensWalter R. Wheeler

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


Geospace Technologies Corporation

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040-6601

July [    ], 2013January 7, 2015

NOTICEOF SAPECIALNNUAL MEETINGOF STOCKHOLDERSTO BE HELD AFUGUSTEBRUARY [    ], 201312, 2015

A SpecialThe Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of Geospace Technologies Corporation will be held at 9:00 a.m. (Houston time) August [    ], 2013,on the 12th of February, 2015, at the company’s corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive,Crowne Plaza Houston Northwest Brookhollow, 12801 Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77040-6601,77040, for the following purposes:

(1) to approve an amendment of the Company’s 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan

1.to elect three directors, each to hold office until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified;

(2) to ratify the grant of certain stock options issued under the Company’s 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan

2.to ratify the appointment by the audit committee of the Board of Directors of BDO USA, LLP, independent public accountants, as our auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015;

3.to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of Geospace Technologies Corporation’s named executive officers;

4.to vote on reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas;

5.and to transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The holders of record of Geospace Technologies Corporation common stock at the close of business on [             ], 2013December 15, 2014 will be entitled to vote at the meeting.

 

By order of the Board of Directors,

/s/ Thomas T. McEntire

Thomas T. McEntire

Secretary

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please sign, date and mail the enclosed proxy card promptly. If you attend the meeting you may vote in person even if you have mailed a signed and dated proxy. Proxies may also be submitted electronically through Internet voting or telephonically. Instructions for telephonic or electronic voting can be found at http://materials.proxyvote.com/37364X.www.edocumentview.com/geos.


Geospace Technologies Corporation

PROXY STATEMENT

July [    ], 2013January 7, 2015

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Geospace Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) is soliciting proxies from its stockholders for the specialannual meeting of stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m. on August [    ], 2013,the 12th of February 2015, at the Company’s corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive,Crowne Plaza Houston Texas 77040-6601,Northwest Brookhollow, 12801 Northwest Freeway, Houston, TX 77040, and for any adjournment thereof.

The Company recently realized that it had granted certain stock options pursuant to its 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”) after the original expiration date of the Plan, and voluntarily informed The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) of the matter. The Company was subsequently advised by NASDAQ that the Company had violated the shareholder approval requirements of NASDAQ. In order to regain compliance with the NASDAQ rules, the Company issued our prior proxy statement materials, dated June 21, 2013 (the “Prior Proxy Statement”), calling for a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders to be held July 16, 2013 in order to seek stockholder approval of an amendment to the Plan extending its term.

One of our stockholders filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that our Prior Proxy Statement materials impermissibly bundled two distinct proposals into one proposal for consideration by our stockholders. While the Company continues to believe that its prior presentation of a single proposal was consistent with the applicable rules, the Company has decided to reschedule the special meeting of our stockholders and re-solicit the proxies of our stockholders to give our stockholders the opportunity to vote on two separate proposals, and to explain the ramifications of the various options presented. We apologize for any inconvenience, and ask that our stockholders disregard our Prior Proxy Statement and the proxies solicited in connection with our Prior Proxy Statement.

You are entitled to vote at the meeting if you were a holder of record of the Company’s common stock (the “Common Stock”) at the close of business on [                ], 2013.December 15, 2014. On July [    ], 2013,January 7, 2015, stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be able to access an electronic version of a proxy card, and this proxy statement and the Company’s 2014 Annual Report at http://materials.proxyvote.com/37364X.www.edocumentview.com/geos. On July [    ], 2013,January 7, 2015, the Company will mailmailed hard copies of these proxy materials to stockholders who have previously elected to receive printed copies.

You may request a printed copy of these proxy materials by sending a written request to Geospace Technologies Corporation, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601, Attention: Secretary. Copies will be mailed to the requesting stockholder free of charge within three business days of the receipt of the request.

On July [    ], 2013,November 30, 2014, there were [12,911,316]13,146,416 shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding. Each share of common stockCommon Stock entitles the holder to one vote on each matter considered at the meeting.

Your proxy card will appoint Gary D. OwensWilliam H. Moody and Thomas T. McEntireL. Davis, Ph.D. as proxy holders, or your representatives, to vote your shares as you indicate. If you sign, date and return your proxy card without specifying voting instructions, the proxy holders will vote your shares (i) FOR the amendmentelection of director nominees named in this proxy statement, (ii) FOR the ratification of the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Planappointment by the audit committee of the Board of BDO USA, LLP, independent public accountants, as our auditors for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015, (iii) FOR the approval of the non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and (ii)(iv) FORratification the approval of certain stock options issued under the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan.reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas.

Signing, dating and returning your proxy card does not preclude you from attending the meeting and voting in person. If you submit more than one proxy, the latest-date proxy will automatically revoke your previous proxy. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by sending written notice, to be delivered before the meeting, to: Computershare Investor Services, 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden, Colorado 80401.

1


The enclosed form of proxy provides a means for you to vote for the proposals listed in this proxy statement or to withhold authority to vote for proposals.

NoThe Board expects the director nominees named in this proxy statement to be available for election. If any director nominee is not available, the proxy holders may vote your shares for a substitute if you have submitted a signed and dated proxy card that does not withhold authority to vote for director nominees.

The Company is not aware of any matters to be brought before the meeting other than those described in this proxy statementstatement. If any other matters not now known are properly brought by the Company before the meeting, and if you return a signed, dated proxy card, the proxy holders may vote your shares in their discretion as to be considered at the meeting.those other matters.

No business can be conducted at the meeting unless a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote is either present at the meeting in person or represented by proxy. The proposals to be considered atthree director nominees who receive the meetingmost votes will be passedelected to the three open directorships even if they receive less than a majority of the votes cast. The proposals relating to the ratification of the appointment of BDO USA, LLP as the auditors of the


Company for the 2015 fiscal year, and the resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers will pass if the proposal receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast. The proposal relating to the reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas will pass if the proposal receives the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting.

Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as shares present for determining a quorum, but will not be counted to determine the total number of votes cast. However, with respect to the reincorporation proposal, which requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote—as opposed to a majority of those present at the meeting—abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a voteagainst the proposal. Broker non-votes occur when nominees, such as brokers and banks holding shares on behalf of the beneficial owners, are prohibited from exercising discretionary voting authority for beneficial owners who have not provided voting instructions. If you do not give instructions to your bank, brokerage firm or other agent, the bank, brokerage firm or other agent will nevertheless be entitled to vote your shares of common stockCommon Stock in its discretion on “routine matters” and may give or authorize the giving of a proxy to vote the shares of common stockCommon Stock in its discretion on such matters. The ratification of independent public accountants is generally a routine matter whereas the election of directors is not considered a routine matter. There are no rights of appraisal or similar dissenters’ rights with respect to any matter to be acted upon pursuant to this proxy statement.

Representatives of Computershare Investors Services, the transfer agent and registrar for the common stock,Common Stock, will act as the inspectors of election at the meeting.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Special2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders To Be Held on August [    ], 2013February 12, 2015

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission rules related to the Internet availability of proxy materials, we have chosen to make this proxy statement, the accompanying notice of annual meeting of stockholders and form of proxy, and our 2014 Annual Report to stockholders available via the Internet at http://materials.proxyvote.com/37364X.www.edocumentview.com/geos.

 

2


PROPOSAL I : ELECTIONOF DIRECTORS

At the meeting, the stockholders will elect three directors. The Board is divided into three classes, each class being composed as equally in number as possible. The classes have staggered three-year terms, with the term of one class expiring at each annual meeting of stockholders.

The directors in Class II, whose terms expire at the meeting, are Tina M. Langtry, Michael J. Sheen and Charles H. Still. The nominating and corporate governance committee of the Company has nominated Ms. Langtry, Mr. Sheen and Mr. Still to serve as Class II directors for a three-year term expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee considered various criteria to evaluate the potential candidates including, without limitation, (1) independence, (2) qualification to serve on the committees of the Board, (3) experience in the seismic industry, (4) knowledge of the oil and gas industry, (5) continuing overall contributions and valuable input to the Board and its committees, and (6) a collaborative, persuasive and articulate personality. The nominating and corporate governance committee also considers all of such person’s diversity attributes (e.g., perspectives, professional experience, experiences derived from high-quality business, skills, background and gender) as a whole and does not necessarily attribute any greater weight to one attribute. Each candidate is considered in the context of their contribution to the Board as a whole with the objective of assembling a group that best contributes to the success of our Company and represents stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment, using its diversity of perspectives, skills and experiences. After discussions, the nominating and corporate governance committee determined that Ms. Langtry, Mr. Sheen and Mr. Still satisfied the criteria considered by the nominating and corporate governance committee, and nominated Ms. Langtry, Mr. Sheen and Mr. Still to stand for election as Class II directors on the Board of the Company.

Ms. Langtry, Mr. Sheen and Mr. Still have been nominated by the nominating and corporate governance committee to serve as Class II directors for a three-year term expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The directors in Class I are serving terms that expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The directors in Class III are serving terms that expire at the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Only Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D., William H. Moody, Charles H. Still and Tina M. Langtry are independent, as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules (the “NASDAQ Rules”) as currently applicable to the Company.

The Board has previously determined the independence of Ms. Langtry and Mr. Still under the criteria established by the NASDAQ and the Securities and Exchange Commission. No specific transactions existed that needed to be considered in determining the independence of Ms. Langtry and Mr. Still in connection with their nomination.

3


Information regarding the director nominees and directors whose terms will continue after the meeting follows.

Nominees for Election for

Class II Directors

(Terms Expiring at the 2015 Annual

Meeting of Stockholders)

  Age   

Position

  Director
Since
 

Tina M. Langtry (b)(c)

   57    Director   2012  

Michael J. Sheen

   66    

Senior Vice President and

Chief Technical Officer, Director

   1997  

Charles H. Still (a)(b)(c)

   72    Director   1997  

Class III Directors

(Terms Expiring at the 2016 Annual

Meeting of Stockholders)

           

William H. Moody (a)

   75    Director   2004  

Gary D. Owens

   67    Chairman of the Board   1997  

Class I Directors

(Terms Expiring at the 2017 Annual

Meeting of Stockholders)

           

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D. (a)(b)(c)

   67    Director   1997  

Richard F. Miles

   66    Director   2013  

(a)Member of the audit committee.
(b)Member of the compensation committee.
(c)Member of the nominating and corporate governance committee.

Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D. became a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997. Dr. Davis is a Professor of Geophysics at the Colorado School of Mines, where he has worked since 1980. He has also been a coordinator of the Reservoir Characterization Project, an industry consortium of the Colorado School of Mines, since it was founded in 1985, with the objective of characterizing reservoirs through development and application of 3-D and time lapse 3-D multicomponent seismology. Dr. Davis consults and lectures worldwide and has written and co-edited numerous papers and other works in the field of seismic interpretation. The Board believes that Dr. Davis’ industry specific experience and expertise and the unique perspective gained from serving as a professor at the Colorado School of Mines enable him to effectively serve as a director.

Tina M. Langtry was the Manager, Discovered Resource Opportunity Evaluations and the General Manager, Global Exploration New Ventures/Business Development for ConocoPhillips from September 2002 until her retirement in January 2008. In such capacity, Ms. Langtry had exploration and appraisal responsibilities for ConocoPhillips’s global new ventures and business development organizations focused on growing ConocoPhillips’s global exploration and production business. Prior to September 2002, Ms. Langtry held various positions with Conoco, Inc., including President and Managing Director of Norske Conoco AS. Ms. Langtry is a member of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. She has also served as the chairperson for American Petroleum Institute’s executive committee for exploration affairs. She served as a Board member of the Norwegian America Chamber of Commerce, Houston Branch and was a member of several leadership teams in ConocoPhillips. The Board believes that Ms. Langtry’s extensive industry knowledge in oil and gas exploration and other expertise related to the oil and gas industry enable her to effectively serve as a director.

Michael J. Sheen joined the Company as Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer in August 1997 and became a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997. Mr. Sheen had been a Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION

4


Geophysical Corp.) beginning in 1991 and had held other positions at Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION Geophysical Corp.) starting in 1977. The Board believes that Mr. Sheen’s depth of understanding of the Company’s operations and strategy, his extensive employment experience with the Company and his significant industry specific experience enable him to effectively serve as a director.

Charles H. Still became a director in connection with the Company’s initial public offering in November 1997. He was Secretary of the Company, serving in a non-executive capacity, from the Company’s formation in September 1994 until February 2009 and was Secretary of various affiliates and predecessors of the Company since 1980. He was a partner in the law firm of Fulbright & Jaworski LLP from 1975 until 2008. As of January 1, 2008, Mr. Still retired as a partner of that firm and became Of Counsel. In 2008, Mr. Still left Fulbright & Jaworski LLP and became a partner in the law firm of Kelly Hart & Hallman LLP. He retired as a partner of that firm on December 31, 2010 and returned to Fulbright & Jaworski LLP as Of Counsel. Mr. Still retired from his position as Of Counsel in January 2014. Mr. Still also served on the Board of Directors of Martin Midstream GP LLC, the general partner of Martin Midstream Partners L.P., from August 2010 until October 2014. The Board believes that Mr. Still’s extensive legal and financial background and board and corporate governance experience enable him to effectively serve as a director.

William H. Moody has been a director since July 2004. Mr. Moody served with KPMG in many capacities including managing partner, audit partner-in-charge and Securities and Exchange Commission reviewing partner until his retirement in June 1996. Mr. Moody previously served on the Board of Directors of Remote Knowledge, Inc. from November 2005 through July 2008. The Board believes that Mr. Moody’s extensive financial and accounting experience, including that related to the energy industry, enables him to effectively serve as a director.

Richard F. Miles has been a director since May 2, 2013. Mr. Miles is the former Chief Executive Officer and a former Director of Geokinetics Inc. He held that position from August 2007 until his retirement in November of 2012. Mr. Miles also served as President of Geokinetics from August 2007 until May 2012, Chief Operating Officer from March 2007 until August 2007, and President-International Operations from September 2006 until March 2007 following Geokinetics’ acquisition of Grant Geophysical Inc. Mr. Miles served as Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of Grant Geophysical from January 2001 until September 2006. From 1990 to 2000, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Syntron Inc., a unit of Tech-Sym Corporation. Prior to that, he held various executive positions of increasing responsibility with Geosource Marine Inc. and Geophysical Services Inc. Mr. Miles has over 45 years of international experience in the seismic industry both operationally and in manufacturing. Mr. Miles has served on the Board of Directors of three other public companies as well as several non-profit boards including the International Association of Geophysical Contractors from 1992—2007, where he served as Chairman from 1997—1998. Mr. Miles has an MBA from Southern Methodist University. The Board believes that Mr. Miles’ extensive history and depth of understanding in the seismic industry enables him to effectively serve as a director.

Gary D. Owens has been a director and Chairman of the Board since 1997. Mr. Owens joined the Company as President and Chief Executive Officer in 1997. He held those positions until his retirement in December 2013. From October 1993 until May 1997, Mr. Owens was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION Geophysical Corp.). Mr. Owens had held other positions at Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION Geophysical Corp.) beginning in 1977. The Board believes that Mr. Owens’ depth of understanding of the Company’s operations and strategy, his strong leadership skills, his extensive employment experience with the Company, and his significant industry and management expertise enable him to effectively serve as a director.

Nominations to the Board

All of the members of the nominating and corporate governance committee are independent, as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules as currently applicable to the Company. The charter for the nominating and corporate governance committee may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com.

5


The nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for reviewing and interviewing qualified candidates to serve on the Board, for making recommendations for nominations to fill vacancies on the Board, and for selecting the nominees for election by the Company’s stockholders at each annual meeting. The nominating and corporate governance committee has not established specific minimum age, education, experience or skill requirements for potential directors. The nominating and corporate governance committee has taken into account all factors it has considered appropriate in fulfilling its responsibilities to identify and recommend individuals as director nominees. Those factors have included, without limitation, the following:

an individual’s business or professional experience, accomplishments, education, judgment, understanding of the business and the industry in which the Company operates, specific skills and talents, independence, time commitments, reputation, general business acumen and personal and professional integrity and character;

the size and composition of the Board and the interaction of its members, in each case with respect to the needs of the Company and its stockholders; and

regarding any individual who has served as a director of the Company, his or her past preparation for, attendance at, and participation in meetings and other activities of the Board or its committees and his or her overall contributions to the Board and the Company.

The nominating and corporate governance committee has utilized a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the nominating and corporate governance committee through current Board members, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. Candidates have been evaluated at regular or special meetings of the nominating and corporate governance committee, and may be considered at any point during the year.

The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider qualified nominees recommended by stockholders. Stockholders desiring to make such recommendations should submit such recommendations to the Company Secretary, c/o Geospace Technologies Corporation, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601. The nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate candidates properly proposed by stockholders in the same manner as all other candidates.

Committees of the Board and Meeting Attendance

The Board has a standing audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee.

Audit Committee. The audit committee is charged with, among other tasks, recommending to the entire Board the engagement and discharge of independent auditors of the financial statements of the Company, reviewing and pre-approving the professional services provided by independent auditors, reviewing the independence of independent auditors, reviewing with the auditors the plan and results of the auditing engagement, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees, reviewing the Company’s system of internal accounting controls and reviewing and reassessing the adequacy of its charter on an annual basis. The audit committee met five times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. The audit committee’s report appears below in this proxy statement. The Board of the Company has made a determination that Mr. Moody, a member of its audit committee who is independent, is the audit committee financial expert. Mr. Moody’s background is described above under “Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors.”

Compensation Committee. The compensation committee oversees our compensation programs and is charged with the review and approval of the Company’s general compensation strategies and objectives and the annual compensation decisions relating to our executives. The compensation committee responsibilities also include reviewing and approving employment agreements, severance agreements and any special supplemental benefits applicable to executives; assuring that the Company’s incentive compensation program, including the annual and long-term incentive programs, are administered in a manner consistent with the Company’s

6


compensation policy; approving and/or recommending to the Board new incentive compensation programs and equity-based compensation programs; reviewing the Company’s employee benefit programs; recommending for approval all changes to compensation plans that may be subject to the approval of our stockholders or the Board; and retaining compensation consultants and other experts. The compensation committee also reviews the outcome of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation. The compensation committee may delegate its authority to subcommittees. The compensation committee charter may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com. The compensation committee met five times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. The compensation committee’s report on executive compensation for fiscal year 2014 appears below in this proxy statement.

For more information pertaining to the Company’s compensation policies and practices, please read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The nominating and corporate governance committee is charged with, among other things, identifying and recommending nominees for election to the Company’s Board at annual meetings and filling vacancies on the Company’s Board, recommending nominees for appointment to the Company’s committees, annually reviewing the overall effectiveness of the organization of the Board and the committees thereof, developing and maintaining qualification criteria and procedures for the identification and recruitment of candidates for election to serve as directors, and annually reviewing the directors, its own performance and its charter. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders. With respect to procedures that must be followed in order for nominations from stockholders to be considered, see “Nominations to the Board” above. The nominating and corporate governance committee met six times during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.

Board Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight

Mr. Owens serves as our Chairman of the Board. He also held the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 until his retirement in December 2013. We have not established a written position description for our Chairman of the Board. A primary function of that position is to set the agenda for and lead meetings of the Company’s Board.

The Board believes that the Company will benefit from Mr. Owens’ continued services as a director and as Chairman of the Board given his extensive experience at the Company’s operations. Our Board does not have an independent lead director.

The Board has an active role in evaluating the Company’s risk management in our ongoing business by regularly reviewing information presented by management regarding the Company’s business and operations risks and monitoring risk areas through board reports and related discussions at board meetings. Our Board also reviews and approves the capital budget on an annual basis. Our committees include an audit committee, which oversees accounting and financial issues and risks, a compensation committee, which reviews leadership performance and compensation, and a nominating and corporate governance committee, which assesses Board performance and corporate governance issues.

Compensation of Directors

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, each non-employee director received $85,000 per year in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional $15,000 per year and the chairman of the audit committee receives an additional $10,000, in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments. Each non-employee director was also granted 500 shares of restricted stock. The shares vest in four equal annual installments with the first installment vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant. All directors are reimbursed for ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.

7


The following table summarizes compensation paid to each non-employee director during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014:

Director Compensation

Name

  Fees Earned or Paid
in Cash

($)
  Stock
Awards ($)
(4)
   All Other
Compensation
($) (1)
   Total
($)
 

Gary D. Owens

   100,000(2)   35,980     —       135,980  

Tina M. Langtry

   85,000    35,980     —       120,980  

Charles H. Still

   85,000    35,980     —       120,980  

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

   85,000    35,980     —       120,980  

Richard F. Miles

   85,000    35,980     —       120,980  

William H. Moody

   95,000(3)   35,980     —       130,980  

(1)All directors of the Company are reimbursed for ordinary and necessary expenses incurred in attending board and committee meetings.
(2)As Chairman of the Board, Mr. Owens receives an additional $15,000 in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments.
(3)As chairman of the audit committee, Mr. Moody receives an additional $10,000 in cash, paid in four equal quarterly installments.
(4)Represents 500 restricted shares granted to each director of the Company on February 6, 2014. The shares vest in four equal annual installments with the first installment vesting on the first anniversary date of the date of grant. As required by SEC rules, amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of stock-based compensation expense as required by FASB ASC Topic 718 Stock Based Compensation. A discussion of the assumptions used to value the restricted stock awards is contained in the notes to the Company’s financial statements.

Directors receive the director compensation payments irrespective of meeting attendance. During fiscal year 2014, each director attended, in person or by telephone, at least 75% of the meetings held by the Board and by the committees on which the director served.

8


PROPOSAL II : ARPPROVALATIFICATIONOF AMENDMENTTO 1997 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLANPPOINTMENTOF ATHEUDITORS

For fiscal years 2013 and 2014, the Company retained UHY, LLP (“UHY”), independent public accountants, to provide audit services to the Company and, in consideration of such services, paid to UHY the amounts specified under the heading “Independent Public Accountants” in this proxy statement. On December 1, 2014, UHY informed the Company that effective on that date, its Texas practice had been acquired by BDO USA, LLP (“BDO”). As a result of this transaction, UHY has elected not to stand for reappointment as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2015.

The audit committee of the Board has appointed BDO to audit our consolidated financial statements for the year ending September 30, 2015, and such appointment has been approved by the Board.

In the event the appointment of BDO is not ratified, the audit committee will consider the appointment of other independent auditors. A representative of BDO is expected to be present at the annual meeting and will be available to make a statement if such representative desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board recommends voting “FOR” this proposal.

9


Audit Committee Report

We have reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 with management and have discussed with UHY, the independent auditors for the Company, the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards, AU Section 380) and related amendments with respect to those statements. We have received the written disclosures and the letter from UHY required by Rule 3526 adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding independence and have discussed with UHY its independence in connection with its audit of the Company’s most recent annual financial statements. Based on this review and these discussions, we recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D., William H. Moody and Charles H. Still were the members of the audit committee during fiscal year 2014. Dr. Davis, Mr. Moody and Mr. Still are independent, as independence is defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Stock Market Rules as currently applicable to the Company.

The Board has adopted a written charter for the audit committee. The charter of the audit committee may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com.

The information in this Audit Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate these paragraphs by reference.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

William H. Moody

Charles H. Still

10


Independent Public Accountants

UHY served as the Company’s principal independent public accountants for fiscal years ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2014. As described above, BDO acquired UHY’s Texas practice. A representative of BDO is expected to attend the annual meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

CAudit Fees

The aggregate fees billed by UHY for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, including for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of internal control over financial reporting in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and the reviews of the financial statements included in the Company’s Forms 10-Q were $460,000 during the 2014 fiscal year and $460,000 during the 2013 fiscal year.

Audit-Related Fees

The Company uses firms other than UHY for certain of its statutory audit-related services for its international subsidiaries. There were no fees billed by UHY for audit-related services not disclosed in “Audit Fees” above for the 2014 or 2013 fiscal years.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees billed by UHY for tax services for the 2014 fiscal year was $38,000. The Company used a firm other than UHY for its tax services for the 2013 fiscal year.

All Other Fees

There were no fees billed by UHY for other services not disclosed above for the 2014 or 2013 fiscal years.

UHY leases all its personnel, who work under the control of UHY partners, from wholly-owned subsidiaries of UHY Advisors, Inc., in an alternative practice structure.

Compatibility of Certain Fees with Independent Accountants’ Independence

The audit committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures pursuant to which the engagement of the Company’s independent accountant is approved. Such procedures govern the ways in which the audit committee will pre-approve audit and various categories of non-audit services that the independent accountant provides to the Company and its subsidiaries. In accordance with this policy, the audit committee had given its approval for the provision of audit services by UHY for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014. Services which have not received pre-approval must receive specific approval of the audit committee. The audit committee is informed of each such engagement in a timely manner, and such procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee’s responsibilities to management. All audit contracts that were entered into in fiscal year 2014 were pre-approved by the audit committee.

11


POMPANYROPOSAL III : ADVISORY (NON-BINDING) VOTETOON EXTENDITSXECUTIVE TCERMOMPENSATION

Our BoardAs required pursuant to Section 14A of Directors (the “Board”) is submitting for stockholder approval the amendment (the “Amendment”)Securities Exchange Act, at the meeting, the stockholders will vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive, focused on pay-for-performance and strongly aligned with the long-term interests of our stockholders. This advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as “Say-on-Pay,” gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to endorse or not endorse the compensation we pay our named executive officers through voting for or against the following resolution:

“Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related discussion).”

The Company and the compensation committee remain committed to the compensation philosophy, policies and objectives outlined under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement. As always, the compensation committee will continue to review all elements of the executive compensation program and take any steps it deems necessary to continue to fulfill the objectives of the program.

Stockholders are encouraged to carefully review the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion of the Company’s executive compensation program.

Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company or the Board. However, the compensation committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements. Additionally, your advisory vote will not be construed (i) as overruling a decision by the Company or the Board, (ii) to create or imply any change to the fiduciary duties of the Company or the Board, (iii) to create or imply any additional fiduciary duties for the Company or the Board, or (iv) to restrict or limit the ability of shareholders to make proposals for inclusion in proxy materials related to executive compensation.

The Board recommends voting “FOR” this proposal.

12


Executive Officers and Compensation

The Company considers the following individuals to be its only executive officers, and there are no other individuals who are head of principal business units, divisions or functions or who perform policy making functions other than the individuals identified below. Information regarding such named executive officers follows:

Name

Age

Position

Gary Owens (a)

67Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

Walter R. Wheeler (a)

61President and Chief Executive Officer

Michael J. Sheen

66Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

Thomas T. McEntire

54Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

Robbin B. Adams

57Executive Vice President and Chief Project Engineer

(a)Effective December 31, 2013 Mr. Owens retired from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Wheeler became President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2014.

Walter R. Wheelerbecame the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2014. Mr. Wheeler served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 2012 until December 31, 2013. Mr. Wheeler had been a design engineer with the Company since 1997. Prior to 1997, Key Employee Stock OptionMr. Wheeler worked for 13 years as a design engineer at Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION Geophysical Corp.). Mr. Wheeler received his Bachelor of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from Rice University.

Thomas T. McEntirejoined the Company as Chief Financial Officer in September 1997 and became Secretary in February 2009. Mr. McEntire had been Financial Controller of APS Holding Corporation (“APS”) beginning in February 1995 and held other senior financial management positions since joining APS in 1990. Prior to joining APS, Mr. McEntire held various positions with Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P. from 1982 to 1990.

Robbin B. Adamsbecame the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Project Engineer in 2012. Mr. Adams has been a design engineer with the Company since 1997. Prior to 1997, Mr. Adams worked for 16 years as a design engineer at Input/Output, Inc. (now known as ION Geophysical Corp.).

Mr. Owens’ and Mr. Sheen’s backgrounds are described above under “Background of Nominees and Continuing Directors.”

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Compensation Program

Objectives of Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain highly talented and experienced management personnel and to reward management for the Company’s successful financial performance and for increasing stockholder value. We provide compensation and incentives through a combination of salaries, annual performance bonuses and long-term incentive stock-based awards.

Executive officers generally receive the same employee and fringe benefits as other employees. Any differences are typically due to position, seniority, or local requirements. Consistent with this philosophy, executive officers receive minimal perquisites. Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire and Adams have entered into employment agreements with the Company, which, under certain circumstances, provide them with certain severance benefits upon their terminations of employment. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below for more information on these benefits. Our compensation policies are designed to enhance our financial performance and stockholder value by aligning the financial interests of the executive officers and employees with those of our stockholders.

13


What Our Compensation is Designed to Reward

Our compensation program is designed to reward teamwork and each individual’s contribution to the Company, including the impact of such contribution on the Company’s overall financial performance, as well as to produce positive long-term results for our stockholders and employees.

Administration

The compensation committee is composed of three non-employee members of the Board. No compensation committee member participates in any of our employee compensation programs. Our non-employee directors are eligible to participate in our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The compensation committee (i) sets and recommends annual compensation, including equity awards, for Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire, and Adams to the full Board for approval, (ii) reviews and approves the compensation program for all other employees as recommended to the compensation committee by the President and Chief Executive Officer, and (iii) reviews and approves awards under equity incentive plans and the non-equity incentive program to all employees as recommended to the compensation committee by management.

The compensation committee does not currently engage any consultant related to executive compensation matters.

At the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders approved, by a non-binding, advisory resolution, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. The compensation committee considered this resolution of the stockholders in its review of executive compensation in fiscal year 2014 and determined that the stockholders generally supported the compensation packages awarded to the Company’s named executive officers, and the objectives and policies by which those packages were determined. Pursuant to a resolution adopted by the stockholders at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders, the stockholders will have an opportunity to approve or withhold approval of executive compensation by a non-binding advisory resolution on an annual basis at each annual meeting of stockholders.

Elements of Compensation

General

The primary elements of the executive compensation program consist of (1) base salary, (2) annual cash bonuses pursuant to a non-equity incentive program, and (3) long term incentives in the form of equity-based compensation awards. Equity-based compensation awards have historically included nonqualified stock options and restricted stock awards. Each executive officer’s current and prior compensation is considered in setting future compensation and, while consideration is given to the vesting and value of previously granted equity-based compensation awards, the total compensation package is not regularly adjusted for such values. In addition, the Company focuses on the relative roles throughout the organization when determining compensation.

The Company chooses to pay each element of compensation to reward executives through various means. The base salary and employee benefits compensate executives for their daily efforts as management of the Company. The annual cash bonus program, described in more detail below, encourages executives to not only meet goals for the Company, measured in terms of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus), but also encourages other employees to meet goals as well. The equity-based compensation awards provide a long term incentive to executives to improve the performance of the Company as viewed by the market.

An executive officer’s annual base salary and annual cash bonus do not fluctuate as a result of increases or decreases in the market value of equity-based compensation awards. Thus, for example, if the stock price has grown significantly, resulting in large potential gains on vested stock awards, an executive officer’s base salary or bonus potential is not adjusted for that reason. However, the compensation committee would consider those gains in awarding additional equity-based compensation. Similarly, the compensation committee would not

14


consider a large cash bonus award under the Company’s annual bonus plan or the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan (as amendedto be a reason to reduce the equity-based compensation awards or annual base salary received by the executive in the following fiscal year. The Company views each compensation element as a different means of encouraging and promoting performance. These compensation elements are designed to work in tandem.

In fiscal year 2013 no new stock options or restricted stock grants were awarded to the named executive officers. In fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee approved grants of restricted stock to the following named executive officers:

Name

Number of Shares of
Restricted Stock
Granted

Walter R. Wheeler

15,000

Michael J. Sheen

10,000

Robbin B. Adams

10,000

Thomas T. McEntire

10,000

No new stock options were awarded in fiscal year 2014 to the named executive officers.

The compensation committee considers the balance of base salary levels supplemented by bonus awards and equity compensation in evaluating the total executive compensation package. The executive officers are encouraged to earn their bonus and equity compensation in order to realize the full value of their compensation package. We intend that the attainment of the performance goals established by the compensation committee will benefit our stockholders.

The compensation committee does not believe that there is another public company that is a peer to the Company in the seismic industry—the Company is a manufacturer of seismic products and does not provide traditional seismic services or maintain a seismic library, unlike other similar companies. One of the Company’s most direct competitors is a subsidiary of a much larger company, and there is no access to salary information of the subsidiary alone. The compensation committee from time to time the “Plan”, anddoes review publicly available information as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended 1997 Plan”), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. The Amended 1997 Plan is a broad-based incentive plan that provides for the granting of awards to our key employees. The Company has previously discussedother seismic industry participants to help its 1997 Non-Employee Director Plan (the “Director Plan”) and its 1999 Broad-Based Option Plan (the “Broad-Based Plan”), neither of which are proposed to be amended. At this time, no additional awards may be granted under the Director Plan or the Broad-Based Plan according to their terms.

The Amendment is intended to retroactively extend the termunderstanding of the Plan until November 14, 2017 as under the technical provisions of the Plan the term expired on November 14, 2007. The Amended 1997 Plan is consistentmarketplace in substance with the original Plan prior to the Amendment. The following is a summary of the Amended 1997 Plan:

Additional restrictions on repricing and extensions of exercisability of stock options are included.

Updates provisions relating to award exercise methods and tax withholding are included.

The date after which no awards may be granted is extended to November 14, 2017.

No additional shares are authorized above the shares previously authorized under the original Plan approved by our stockholders.

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that will be available for issuance under the Amended 1997 Plan is approximately 184,350 shares.

Since August 1, 2001, the Company has only issued stock options undercompetes to retain executive talent. Management assists the Plan. If the Amendment is approved, the Compensation Committee and the Board contemplate that stock options may be issuedcommittee in gathering this information from other companies in the future. Although allowed by the Amended 1997 Plan, neither the Compensation Committee nor the Board currently anticipates granting restricted stock awardsseismic industry. The compensation committee strives to executives or other employeesmaintain a reasonable compensation package for each executive officer in the foreseeable future.

The Amended 1997 Plan is proposedorder to enable us toretain such officer and provide a meansincentives for such officer to continue to attract ableimprove the Company’s performance in the future.

In setting compensation levels for fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee did not undertake to perform a formal analysis of its other seismic industry participants’ executive salaries. The conclusion of the compensation committee after its most recent examination of the publicly available executive compensation of certain seismic industry participants from 2010 was that the Company’s compensation of each of its executive officers, particularly their base salaries, were well within and typically much lower than the compensation of executive officers in other seismic industry companies, adjusting for various factors such as size, location and seniority of the executive officer.

The Company places a high priority on the retention of its key employees, particularly our executive officers. The Board of the Company believes that these executive officers have made significant contributions to the growth and to providedevelopment of the Company and have developed a means whereby those individualssynergy among themselves that fosters progress and support. The Board believes that a loss of any one of these executive officers could have a significant adverse impact on the Company. The compensation committee has further recognized that contributions from Sheen and McEntire continued for a period of seven years during which their salaries remained stagnant while the salaries of executives in other seismic industry companies steadily increased. Based upon whomthese considerations, the responsibilities restcompensation committee designed compensation packages for our successful administration and management, and whose present and potential contributionsexecutive officers.

15


The compensation committee targets overall compensation packages for our executive officers that are of importance, can acquire and maintain ownershipcompetitive compared to the total value received by comparable executive officers at other seismic industry companies. Due to the nature of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), thereby strengthening their concernbusiness, it is possible for our executive officers to receive substantial financial rewards when the Company’s welfare. A further purposefiscal year financial performance exceeds expectations. Conversely, in years when the Company’s fiscal year financial performance does not meet expectations, our executive officers will receive minimal financial compensation, if any, in addition to their base salaries. Thus, to establish some consistency that would improve the likelihood of retention of these executive officers, the compensation committee attempts to maintain annual base salary ranges that are intended to keep salaries reasonably competitive with salaries at other seismic industry companies. The remaining portions of the Amended 1997executives’ compensation packages are tied to the Company’s financial performance, thus providing an incentive to executive officers and a benefit to our stockholders.

Chief Executive Officer

In the fiscal year 2012, Mr. Owens’ annual base salary was increased by 10% to $302,500 taking into account the record performance of the Company during the fiscal year 2011 and the differential between Mr. Owens’ total compensation package and those in similar positions in other seismic industry companies. Mr. Owens also participated in the 2012 Bonus Plan, which is described in more detail under “Annual Performance Bonuses” below. No discretionary bonus was awarded to provide such individualsMr. Owens during the fiscal year 2012. Mr. Owens’ overall compensation package for fiscal year 2012 had a value of $582,024.

In the fiscal year 2013, Mr. Owens’ compensation package was not adjusted from fiscal year 2012 levels. Mr. Owens also participated in the 2013 Bonus Plan, which is described in more detail under “Annual Performance Bonuses” below. No discretionary bonus was awarded to Mr. Owens during the fiscal year 2013. Mr. Owens’ overall compensation package for fiscal year 2013 had a value of $595,313.

In the first quarter of fiscal year 2014, Mr. Owens’ compensation package was not adjusted from fiscal year 2013 levels. Mr. Owens did not participate in the 2014 Bonus Plan, which is described in more detail under “Annual Performance Bonuses” below. No discretionary bonus was awarded to Mr. Owens during the fiscal year 2014. Mr. Owens’ overall compensation package for fiscal year 2014 had a value of $99,303 and Mr. Owens retired from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer on December 31, 2013.

Beginning with additional incentivehis appointment to the position on January 1, 2014, Mr. Wheeler’s annual base salary was set at $300,000 based on his experience, qualifications, familiarity with the Company, base salary of other executive officers at the Company and reward opportunities designedthose in similar positions in other seismic industry companies. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2014 with greater bonus pool potential than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to enhance our profitable growth. Accordingly,fiscal year 2013. Mr. Wheeler’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2014 had a value of $1,995,470.

Chief Technical Officer

In the Amended 1997fiscal year 2012, Mr. Sheen’s annual base salary was increased by 10% to $272,250 taking into account the record performance of the Company during the fiscal year 2011 and the differential between Mr. Sheen’s total compensation package and those in similar positions in other seismic industry companies. Mr. Sheen also participated in the 2012 Bonus Plan, provideswhich is described in more detail under “Annual Performance Bonuses” below. No discretionary bonus was awarded to Mr. Sheen during the fiscal year 2012. Mr. Sheen’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2012 had a value of $545,571.

In fiscal year 2013, Mr. Sheen’s compensation package was not adjusted from fiscal year 2012 levels. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the following:compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2013 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to fiscal year 2012. Mr. Sheen’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2013 had a value of $562,832.

 

16


In fiscal year 2014, Mr. Sheen’s annual base salary was increased by 10.2% to $300,000 taking into account, among other things, the performance of the Company. Although no discretionary grantsbonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2014 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to our employees orfiscal year 2013. Mr. Sheen’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2014 had a value of $1,530,260.

Chief Financial Officer

In the employeesfiscal year 2012, Mr. McEntire’s annual base salary was increased by 10% to $242,000 taking into account the record performance of our subsidiary corporationsthe Company during the fiscal year 2011 and the differential between Mr. McEntire’s total compensation package and those in similar positions in other seismic industry companies. Mr. McEntire also participated in the 2012 Bonus Plan, which is described in more detail under “—Annual Performance Bonuses” below. No discretionary bonus was awarded to Mr. McEntire during the fiscal year 2012. Mr. McEntire’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2012 had a value of stock options$516,899.

In fiscal year 2013, Mr. McEntire’s compensation package was not adjusted from fiscal year 2012 levels. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2013 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to fiscal year 2012. Mr. McEntire’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2013 had a value of $530,561.

In fiscal year 2014, Mr. McEntire’s annual base salary was increased by 13.6% to $275,000 taking into account, among other things, the performance of the Company. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2014 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to fiscal year 2013. Mr. McEntire’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2014 had a value of $1,499,703.

Chief Project Engineer

Beginning with his appointment to the position on January 1, 2012, Mr. Adams’ annual base salary was set at $160,000 based on his experience, qualifications, familiarity with the Company, base salary of other executive officers at the Company and those in similar positions in other seismic industry companies. Mr. Adams also participated in the 2012 Bonus Plan, which is described in more detail under “—Annual Performance Bonuses” below. Mr. Adams’ overall compensation package for fiscal year 2012 had a value of $311,179.

In fiscal year 2013, Mr. Adam’s compensation package was not adjusted from fiscal year 2012 levels. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2013 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to fiscal year 2012. Mr. Adam’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2013 had a value of $327,912.

In fiscal year 2014, Mr. Adam’s annual base salary was increased by 56.25% in recognition of his increased duties and also in light of the performance of the Company. Although no discretionary bonus was awarded, the compensation committee approved a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan for fiscal year 2014 with greater bonus pools than those established under a similar cash bonus compensation plan applicable to fiscal year 2013. Mr. Adam’s overall compensation package for fiscal year 2014 had a value of $1,456,755.

Base Annual Salaries

Before the Company’s initial public offering in 1997, and before the formation of the compensation committee, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Sheen. The compensation level

17


reflected in the employment agreement was established in July 1997 by negotiations by Mr. Sheen, before he joined the Company, and representatives of OYO Corporation U.S.A., the Company’s sole stockholder at that constitute incentive stock options as defined intime. The employment agreement was amended, effective October 1, 2008, to bring the agreement into documentary compliance with Section 422162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”(the “Code”) (“Incentive Stock Options”);, and does not otherwise affect his current compensation level.

The base annual salaries of the Company’s named executive officers at the end of fiscal year 2014 were as follows:

 

Mr. Owens, Chairman of the Board and former President and Chief Executive Officer (1)

  $75,625  

Mr. Wheeler, President and Chief Executive Officer (2)

  $300,000  

Mr. Sheen, Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

  $300,000  

Mr. McEntire, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

  $275,000  

Mr. Adams, Executive Vice President and Chief Project Engineer

  $250,000  

discretionary grants

(1)Reflects Mr. Owens’ actual pro-rated annual salary for the period October 1, 2013 through his retirement on December 31, 2013. Mr. Owens’ annualized salary would have been $302,500.
(2)Reflects Mr. Wheeler’s base annual salary as a result of his new position as President and Chief Executive Officer beginning January 1, 2014. Mr. Wheeler’s actual pro-rated annual salary for the period January 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014 was $225,000.

The compensation committee has the authority to ouradjust these base salaries; however, the employment agreements for each executive officer requires that the base salaries not be reduced from the base amounts set forth above. After the end of the 2013 fiscal year, the compensation committee approved an increase in base salary for the Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer of 10.2%, and the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of 13.6%, effective January 1, 2014. These increases were determined by the compensation committee to be appropriate in order to retain Messrs. Sheen and McEntire in light of, among other things, the performance of the Company. Also effective January 1, 2014, Mr. Adams’ salary was increased by 56.25% in recognition of his increased duties as Chief Project Engineer and also in light of the performance of the Company. Mr. Owens’s annual base salary remained at $302,500 until his retirement from the position of President and Chief Executive Officer on December 31, 2013.

For the same period, Mr. Wheeler’s increase in his salary was the result of his appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2014. Mr. Wheeler’s new salary and total compensation package as President and Chief Executive Officer was set to reflect his significant new responsibilities, and the current compensation committee reviewed salary information from several other seismic industry companies in this regard.

Annual Performance Bonuses

In December 2013, management recommended to the Board a comprehensive, company-wide cash bonus compensation plan (the “2014 Bonus Plan”) for all employees (or employees of our affiliates, such as our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries) of stock options that do not constitute Incentive Stock Options (“Non-statutory Stock Options”).

for fiscal year 2014. The Board adopted the Amended 19972014 Bonus Plan on May 2, 2013, subject to stockholder approvalfollowing discussion at the Special Meeting. Ifsame meeting. The 2014 Bonus Plan, which follows the Amended 1997same principles, goals and criteria as in the bonus plan previously established for prior fiscal years, set forth various targets and criteria for the Company’s operating performance and established a cash bonus, assessed on an individual basis, for employees of the Company. The financial targets were designed to provide incentives for the employees to work as a team to improve our financial results.

Under the 2014 Bonus Plan, every employee of the Company is not approved by our stockholders ateligible to participate in Tier I of the Special Meeting, then no future awards will be granted underBonus Plan, except for employees in the Plan.Russian Federation who participate in a local plan. Under Tier I, employees share proportionally in the Company’s profits based on each employee’s relative payroll. The PlanTier I bonus pool is our only existing compensatory plan under which equity awards relating to shares of Common Stock may be granted to our key employees. As of July [    ], 2013, the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that remain available to be issued under the Plan, and will be available under the Amended 1997 Plan, is approximately 184,350 shares.

 

318


Reasonsestablished by accruing 14.2% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) above a specified range. Various management teams, including the Board Recommends Voting For Approvalexecutive officers, and selected key employees are eligible to participate in Tier II of the 2014 Bonus Plan, Amendmentwhich applies after Tier I is fully funded. The Tier II bonus pool is established by accruing 14.2% of consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) within a specified range above Tier I. Under Tier II, certain participants share in the bonus pool depending on the satisfaction of predefined goals by their respective working groups. None of the named executive officers were required to satisfy predefined goals under the 2014 Bonus Plan. Tier I bonuses are paid if the Company reaches a predetermined pretax profit (before bonus) level. Tier II is based on attaining a predetermined consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) level as well as, in most cases (but not in the case of our named executive officers), specific performance criteria of the group eligible for the bonus. The predetermined pretax profits (before bonus) levels as well as the specific performance criteria are re-evaluated annually. The groups eligible for Tier II bonuses in one year are not necessarily eligible the following year. The eligible groups are selected based on management’s goals for improvement across the Company.

Our named executive officers were not required to achieve individual performance targets in order to earn their respective annual cash incentive payments under the 2014 Bonus Plan. However, the consolidated pretax profits (before bonus) of the Company must reach a predetermined threshold before Tier I or Tier II bonus payments will be made. The difficulty of attaining the performance criteria fluctuates in response to the Company’s industry, market and overall performance. While each of Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire and Adams has the ability to influence the Company’s financial performance, none of them can ensure that the Company’s performance will rise to the level of satisfying the Tier I or Tier II thresholds. During fiscal year 2014, the Tier I bonus pool of $3,500,000 was fully funded. The Tier II bonus pool was funded in the amount of $2,990,000.

At the annual stockholders meeting held on February 23, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved the OYO Geospace Corporation Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan (the “Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan”). Only executive employees who are or may become “covered employees” of the Company, as defined in Section 162(m) of the Code are eligible participants. Thus, only Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen and Adams are eligible to participate in the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. The performance goal necessary for the payment of bonuses under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan is the achievement of positive return on stockholder equity, as reported in the Company’s year-end or, if applicable, quarterly earnings release. The compensation committee may, in its discretion, add additional terms or conditions to the receipt of a bonus under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan so long as such additional terms and conditions do not contradict the terms of the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. Thus, if the performance criteria of positive return on stockholder equity is not satisfied, the compensation committee will not award bonuses under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. In no event may a bonus be paid pursuant to the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan to any participant for any fiscal year be in excess of $1.0 million. The ability to achieve the performance criteria required under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan is analogous to the challenge presented by the 2014 Bonus Plan criteria: the difficulty of attaining the performance criteria fluctuates in response to the Company’s industry, market and overall performance. While the actions and individual job performance of each of Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen and Adams may influence the Company’s financial performance, none of them can ensure that the Company’s performance will result in a positive return on stockholder equity.

Long-Term Stock-Based Compensation

The Board believesWe also believe that encouraging our employeeslong-term incentive compensation is an important component of the Company’s compensation program and that the value of this compensation should be directly related to own sharesincreases in stockholder value. Therefore, in addition to base salaries and annual performance bonuses, the executive officers have historically participated in the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan, as amended, which allowed the Company to grant long-term incentive compensation to its executive officers in the form of stock options and restricted stock awards. These options and restricted stock awards typically vest 25% per year over four years and are therefore intended to compensate executive officers for long-term appreciation in the market value of our Common Stock fosters broad alignment betweenStock.

19


Historically, stock option grants and restricted stock awards were determined based on an individual’s annual compensation and their contribution to the interestscompany. The compensation committee independently sets and recommends stock option grants and restricted stock awards for the Company’s executive officers to the full Board for approval. The proposed stock option and restricted stock awards to non-executives is presented by the President and Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Board upon the recommendation of employeesthe compensation committee. Mr. Sheen abstains from voting with respect to his own compensation and option grants. In fiscal year 2014, Mr. Wheeler was awarded 15,000 shares of restricted stock and Messrs. Sheen, McEntire and Adams were each award 10,000 shares of restricted stock. In fiscal year 2014, no stock options were awarded to the Company’s executive officers and no stock options were exercised by the Company’s executive officers.

Relative Size of Major Compensation Elements

The combination of base salary, annual non-equity incentive awards and equity incentive awards comprise total direct compensation. In setting named executive officer compensation, the compensation committee considers the aggregate compensation payable to the executive officer and the interestsform of our stockholders.the compensation. The Boardcompensation committee seeks to achieve the appropriate balance between immediate cash rewards and incentives for the achievement of both annual and long-term financial and non-financial objectives.

Timing of Compensation Decisions

On September 26, 2013, the compensation committee approved an increase in base salary for Mr. Wheeler of 71.4% as a result of his appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 1, 2014 to reflect his significant new responsibilities and reviewed salary information from several other seismic industry companies. The compensation committee also believes that extendingapproved an increase in the base salaries for Mr. Sheen, Senior Vice President and continuingChief Technical Officer of 10.2%, Mr. McEntire, the Plan will bringVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of 13.6% and Mr. Adams, the Chief Project Engineer of 56.25%, effective January 1, 2014. These increases was determined by the compensation committee to be appropriate in order to retain Messrs. Sheen, McEntire and Adams following the compensation committee’s evaluation of peer company data and in light of, among other things, the performance of the Company into complianceduring fiscal year 2013 and the period of time that had elapsed since the last adjustment to executive compensation, which had occurred at the end of fiscal year 2011.

Benefits

We offer a variety of health and welfare and retirement programs to all eligible employees. Executive officers generally are eligible for the same benefit programs on the same basis as the rest of the broad-based employees. The health and welfare programs are intended to protect employees against catastrophic loss and encourage a healthy lifestyle. Our health and welfare programs include medical, wellness, pharmacy, dental, life insurance and accidental death and disability. Each employee receives life insurance equal to the employee’s annual salary with NASDAQ listing requirements,a maximum payout of $100,000 and will further helpaccidental death and dismemberment coverage.

We maintain a defined contribution retirement plan that is intended to qualify under Section 401(k) of the Code. The plan covers all full-time employees who meet age and service requirements. The plan provides for pre-tax, elective employee contributions with a matching contribution from us ranging from 50% to attract, motivate100% of employee contributions, up to a maximum of 3.5% of the employee’s annual salary.

We offer vacation time determined by years of service. As of September 30, 2014, Mr. Sheen had accrued 322 hours of vacation; Mr. McEntire had accrued 198 hours of vacation; Mr. Wheeler had accrued 322 hours of vacation; and retain talented, qualified employees.Mr. Adams had accrued 254 hours of vacation. Employees, including executive officers, may roll over up to 160 hours of unused vacation time to subsequent years.

Other Matters ConsideredPerquisites

As described above, we maintain life insurance policies on each named executive officer for the benefit of such executive’s family members. The maximum payout under each of these policies is $100,000. We also

20


maintain key man life insurance policies on each executive officer exclusively for the benefit of the Company. Additionally, the Company provides promotional shirts, hats and Company logo golf balls to employees for use at Company-sponsored events and exhibitions. The Company may, during years when the Company is meeting its financial goals, reimburse the executive officers for the travel expenses of each executive’s spouse to attend certain annual geophysical conferences in North America and Europe.

Impact of Accounting and Tax Treatment

A standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board

In determining whether requires a public company to extendmeasure the termcost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant date fair value of the Plan andaward. The equity awards we grant are structured to recommendcomply with the Amended 1997 Plan to our stockholders for approval, the Board also considered a stockholder cost analysis, burn rate analysis and voting power dilution analysis prepared by an independent third party consultant (the “Plan Consultant”). The Plan Consultant’s analysis includes an estimate that the stockholder cost percentage resulting from the extensionrequirements of the Amended 1997 Plan fromstandard to maintain the appropriate equity accounting treatment.

Section 162(m) of the Code places a limit of $1,000,000 on the amount of compensation paid to the chief executive officer and after the datefour other most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the chief financial officer) that may be deducted by us in our U.S. tax return in any year unless the compensation is performance-based compensation as described in Section 162(m) and the related regulations. The compensation committee believes the compensation earned in excess of this proxy statement could be 3.74%, which is belowamount by Messrs. Sheen, Wheeler and Adams, including compensation attributable to the acceptable dilutive impact threshold noted by the Plan Consultant. The stockholder cost percentage was computed by the Plan Consultant as the estimated cost to stockholders of the Amended 1997 Plan’s extension from and after the date of this proxy statement expressed as a percentage of the Company’s estimated total market value. The Plan Consultant’s analysis indicated that the Company’s average burn rateexercise of stock options, overwill not result in a material loss of tax deductions to the 2012, 2011 and 2010 fiscal years was 0.35% (calculated utilizing the Plan Consultant’s internal burn rate formula), as compared to an industry burn rate threshold of 4.57%. The Plan Consultant’s analysis indicated that the Company’s average burn rate of stock options over the 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009, and 2008 fiscal years was 0.70%. The average burn rates over such three and five year periods were calculated by the Plan Consultant as the averageCompany.

Section 409A of the numberCode, as amended (“Section 409A”), provides that deferrals of shares underlying awards grantedcompensation under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for all taxable years are currently includible in each such fiscal year divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for that fiscal year. The Plan Consultant’s burn rate formula differs from our internal burn rate formula in that it applies a multiplier to “full value awards” (shares underlying restricted stock awards and other full value awards for which the participant does not pay for the shares), resulting in a higher burn rate. The Plan consultant’s analysis includes an estimate that the voting power dilution (on a fully diluted basis) result from the extension of the Plan from and after the date of this proxy statement could be 3.88%, which is below the 10.23% voting power dilution percentage noted by the Plan Consultant.

Potential Impacts of Approval by Stockholders of the Amended 1997 Plan

The Board believes that adopting the Amendment is in the best interest of the stockholders as the Board believes that granting equity-based compensation will incentivize our employees to work to achieve stock price appreciation and will better enable us to attract and retain talented, qualified employees. Additional grants of optionsgross income to the Company’s key employees under the Amended 1997 Plan would dilute the interestsextent not subject to a substantial risk of stockholders as the number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis would increase. While it isforfeiture and not possiblepreviously included in gross income, unless certain requirements are met. We intend to predict with precision the dilutive effect that the approval of the Amendment may have on our stockholders, as noted above, the Plan Consultant’s analysis indicates that the stockholder cost percentage resulting from the extension of the Plan from and after the date of this proxy statement is estimatedstructure any deferred compensation items to be 3.74%.in compliance with Section 409A.

 

421


Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding compensation paid for services rendered during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, to each of our named executive officers:

Summary Compensation Table

Name and

Principal

Position

 Year  Salary
($)
  Bonus
($) (3)
  Stock
Awards
($) (4)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (5)
  Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
 

Walter R. Wheeler,

President and CEO (1)

  2012    175,000    —      —      162,781    —      5,377    343,158  
  2013    175,000    —      —      164,075    —      5,202    344,277  
  2014    267,895    —      1,480,200    240,635    —      6,740    1,995,470  

Gary D. Owens,

Chairman of the Board, President and CEO (2)

  2012    302,500    —      —      272,192    —      7,228    582,024  
  2013    302,500    —      —      285,954    —      7,332    595,313  
  2014    98,894    —      —      —      —      409    99,303  

Michael J. Sheen

Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

  2012    272,250    —      —      269,942    —      3,379    545,571  
  2013    272,250    —      —      283,704    —      6,878    562,832  
  2014    293,054    —      986,800    242,535    —      7,871    1,530,260  

Thomas T. McEntire,

Vice President, Chief Financial

Officer and Secretary

  2012    242,000    —      —      267,753    —      7,146    516,899  
  2013    242,000    —      —      281,516    —      7,045    530,561  
  2014    266,533    —      986,800    240,535    —      5,835    1,499,703  

Robbin B. Adams,

Executive Vice President and Chief Project Engineer

  2012    160,000    —      —      148,616    —      2,563    311,179  
  2013    160,000    —      —      163,110    —      4,802    327,912  
  2014    226,877    —      986,800    237,422    —      5,656    1,456,755  

(1)Mr. Wheeler served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer until his appointment to President and CEO on January 1, 2014.
(2)Mr. Owens retired from his positions as President and CEO on December 31, 2013.
(3)Except for discretionary bonus amounts, bonus amounts are reported as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” since these cash amounts were awarded by the compensation committee under the 2012 Bonus Plan, the 2013 Bonus Plan, the 2014 Bonus Plan and the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan, as applicable. The awards under the 2013 Bonus Plan are discussed in further detail below in connection with the2014 Grant of Plan-Based Awards Table.
(4)As required by SEC rules, amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date value of stock-based compensation expense as required by FASB ASC Topic 718 Stock Based Compensation. A discussion of the assumptions used to value the restricted stock awards is contained in the notes to the Company’s financial statements.
(5)The values listed for fiscal year 2012 were awarded under the 2012 Bonus Plan, but not paid until fiscal year 2013. The 2012 Bonus Plan was designed with a two tier structure. The Tier I pool, which is allocated among all employees based upon relative payroll amounts, was capped at $2,250,000. Tier I pool was funded by an accrual of 15.3% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold (5% return on stockholder equity). The Tier II pool was capped at $2,530,000, funding at 15.3% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold. In May 2012, the Board approved a 20% increase to the Tier I and Tier II bonus pools. The Board determined that this adjustment to the bonus pools were appropriate to reward the Company’s employees, including the named executive officers and other members of management, for the record revenues earned by the Company during the prior fiscal quarter and to provide an incentive to increase and improve revenues even further as the fiscal year continued. After the May 2012 adjustment, the Tier I bonus pool was capped at $2,700,000 and the Tier II bonus pool was capped at $3,036,000. The minimum predetermined threshold was satisfied for fiscal year 2012. Both the Tier I bonus pool and the Tier II bonus pool were fully funded.

22


The values listed for fiscal year 2013 were awarded under the 2013 Bonus Plan, but not paid until fiscal year 2014. The 2013 Bonus Plan was designed with a two tier structure. The Tier I pool, which is allocated among all employees based upon relative payroll amounts, was capped at $3,050,000. Tier I pool was funded by an accrual of 16.7% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold (5% return on stockholder equity). The Tier II pool was capped at $3,450,000, funding at 16.7% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold. The minimum predetermined threshold was satisfied for fiscal year 2013. Both the Tier I bonus pool and the Tier II bonus pool were fully funded.

The values listed for fiscal year 2014 were awarded under the 2014 Bonus Plan, but not paid until fiscal year 2015. The 2014 Bonus Plan was designed with a two tier structure. The Tier I pool, which is allocated among all employees based upon relative payroll amounts, was capped at $3,500,000. Tier I pool was funded by an accrual of 14.2% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold (5% return on stockholder equity). The Tier II pool was capped at $3,700,000, funding at 14.2% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold. The minimum predetermined threshold for Tier I was satisfied for fiscal year 2014. The Tier I bonus pool was fully funded and the Tier II bonus pool was funded in the amount of $2,990,000.

Additionally, on February 23, 2009, the Company’s stockholders approved the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. Only Messrs. Sheen, Wheeler and Adams are eligible to participate in the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. The terms of the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan establish a performance goal whereby return on stockholder equity must be positive to permit distribution of bonuses under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. If the positive return on stockholder equity goal is not met for any given year, no bonuses will be paid under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan for the applicable year. This performance goal was met in fiscal year 2012, 2013 and 2014. However, the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan gives the compensation committee the discretion to add additional terms or conditions to the receipt of a bonus under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan so long as such additional terms and conditions do not contradict the terms of the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan. The compensation committee declined to award any amounts to Messrs. Sheen, Wheeler and Adams under the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan due to the significant amount awarded to the executive officers under the 2012, 2013 and 2014 Bonus Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table summarizes information with respect to our equity plan information is accuratecompensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as of September 30, 2012:

Equity Compensation Plan Information2014:

 

Plan Category

  Number of Securities to be
Issued upon Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)
  Weighted-average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)
  Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column
(a))
(c)
 

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders

   245,356(2)  $13.93(2)   184,350(3) 

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders (1)

   600   $4.25    38,000  

Plan category

  Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (a)
   Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights (b)
   Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
(excluding securities
reflected in column
(a))

(c)
 
   (In shares)   (In dollars per share)   (In shares) 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders (1)

   89,700    $17.27     1,480,500  

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

   —       —       —    

Total

   89,700    $17.27     1,480,500  

 

(1)

The number of securities shown in column (c) represents number of securities remaining available for issuance under the Company’s 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan”), which was approved by the Board and shareholders in February 2014. The 2014 Plan allows for the issuance of restricted stock awards, performance stock awards, performance stock unit awards, restricted stock unit awards (the foregoing, “Full Value Awards”), stock options and stock appreciation rights. For purposes of calculating the number of securities remaining under the 2014 Plan in column (c), Full Value Awards are to be issued pursuantcounted as 1.5 shares for each share awarded. During fiscal year 2014, an aggregate of 13,000 restricted shares were

23


granted under the 2014 Plan. During fiscal year 2014, the Board also authorized the grant under the Company’s 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the “1997 Plan”) of 184,000 restricted stock awards, including the grant of restricted stock awards for 45,000 restricted shares to the Company’s 1999 Broad-Based Optionnamed executive officers. The number of securities shown in column (a) of the table above relates solely to stock options issued under the 1997 Plan. A description of such plan is provided in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table indicates the beneficial ownership as of December 5, 2014 of shares of Common Stock of each director and named executive officer, each person known to the Company to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock and all directors and named executive officers as a group, along with the percentage of outstanding Common Stock that such ownership represents. The Company based the information regarding beneficial ownership by third persons of more than 5% of its outstanding capital stock on a search of all Schedules 13D and 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the Common Stock and additional information received by the Company from NASDAQ. Each person named has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated except as otherwise stated in the notes to the table.

Beneficial Owner

  Shares   Percentage 

Eagle Asset Management, Inc. (1)

   1,880,686     11.54

Brown Capital Management, LLC (5)

   1,465,708     11.15

BlackRock, Inc. (4)

   1,415,892     7.91

The Vanguard Group, Inc. (6)

   824,149     6.43

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

   18,854      

Thomas T. McEntire

   32,000      

William H. Moody

   7,694      

Gary D. Owens

   221,524     1.68

Michael J. Sheen

   10,000      

Charles H. Still

   5,500      

Walter R. Wheeler (3)

   75,425      

Robbin B. Adams (2)

   25,050      

Tina M. Langtry

   600      

Richard F. Miles

   950      

Executive officers and directors as a group (10 people)

   397,597     3.02

*Less than one percent.
(1)Amended Schedule 13G filed with the SECSecurities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2012.January 30, 2014, indicates that Eagle Asset Management, Inc. beneficially owns 1,880,686 shares. The address indicated on this form is 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716. Other information received as of a later date indicates that Eagle Asset Management, Inc. owns the number of shares indicated above.
(2)Includes the Relevant Options (as defined below in Proposal 2).vested unexercised options to purchase 13,500 shares. Mr. Adam’s business address is 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601.
(3)Includes vested unexercised options to purchase 26,000 shares. Mr. Wheeler’s business address is 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601.
(4)Schedule 13G Amendment No. 3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 10, 2014, indicates that BlackRock, Inc. beneficially owns 1,415,892 shares, and has sole voting power with respect to 1,370,413 shares. The address indicated on this form is 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022. Other information received as of a later date indicates that BlackRock, Inc. owns the number of securities remainingshares indicated above.
(5)Schedule 13G Amendment No. 6 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 5, 2014, indicates that Brown Capital Management, LLC beneficially owns the number of shares mentioned above and has sole voting power with respect to 922,172 shares. The address indicated on this form is 1201 N. Calvert Street, Baltimore, MD 21202.

24


(6)Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2014 indicates that The Vanguard Group beneficially owns 824,149 shares. The address indicated on this form is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. Other information received as of a later date indicates that The Vanguard Group owns the number of shares indicated above.

Employee Equity Incentive Plans

In February 2014, the Board and stockholders approved the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (the Plan), which replaced the 1997 Key Employee Stock Incentive Plan.

The Plan is administered by the compensation committee. Under the Plan, the compensation committee may grant incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options and restricted stock. The purchase price of shares subject to an incentive option granted under the Plan is determined by the compensation committee and may not be less than the greater of: (a) 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted or (b) the aggregate par value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The compensation committee in its discretion may provide that the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an incentive option shall be more than 100% of fair market value. In the case of any 10% stockholder, the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under an incentive option shall not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date the incentive option is granted. The price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under a nonqualified option shall not be less than the greater of: (a) 100% of the fair market value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted or (b) the aggregate par value of the shares of Common Stock on the date the option is granted. The compensation committee in its discretion may provide that the price at which shares of Common Stock may be purchased under a nonqualified option shall be more than 100% of fair market value.

Options granted under the Plan must be exercised within ten years from the date of grant. In the case of a 10% stockholder, no incentive option shall be exercisable after the expiration of five years from the date the incentive option is granted.

Generally, awards granted under the Plan are not transferable by the holder other than by will or under the laws of descent and distribution. Options granted under the Plan, if vested, terminate on the earlier of (i) the expiration date of the option or (ii) one day less than three months after the date the holder of the option terminates his or her employment with us for any reason other than the death, disability or the retirement of such holder. During such three-month period the holder may exercise the option in respect of the number of shares that were vested on the date of such severance of employment. In the event of severance because of the death, disability or retirement of a holder before the expiration date of the option, the option terminates on the earlier of such (i) expiration date or (ii) one year following the date of severance. During this period the holder, or his or her heirs, as the case may be, generally may exercise the option in respect of the number of shares that were vested on the date of severance because of death, disability or retirement.

At September 30, 2014, an aggregate of 1,480,500 shares of common stock were available for issuance under the Plan.

25


Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

The following table summarizes plan-based awards granted to named executive officers of the Company during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014:

2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

 

Name

 

 

Grant
Date

  

Estimated Possible Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)

  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares (#)  (5)
  Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
Awards ($)
 
  Threshold
($) (2)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
   

Walter R. Wheeler

  11/21/13(3)   —      240,635    240,635(4)   —      —      —      15,000    1,480,200  

Michael J. Sheen

  11/21/13(3)   —      242,535    242,535(4)   —      —      —      10,000    986,800  

Thomas T. McEntire

  11/21/13(3)   —      240,535    240,535(4)   —      —      —      10,000    986,800  

Robbin B. Adams

  11/21/13(3)   —      237,422    237,422(4)   —      —      —      10,000    986,800  

(1)Bonuses were paid under the 2014 Bonus Plan because the minimum predetermined threshold was satisfied as of September 30, 2014.
(2)Neither the 2014 Bonus Plan nor the Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan includes threshold amounts for payout. The bonus amount that a named executive officer receives may range from zero to the stated maximum, fluctuating as a function of the overall financial performance of the Company.
(3)Refers to the date on which the compensation committee approved and established the 2014 Bonus Plan and awarded the restricted stock grants.
(4)Represents amounts that were paid to the named executive officer upon the satisfaction of the predetermined threshold for Tier I and Tier II under the 2014 Bonus Plan, as described above, in the maximum amount. The actual payout amount is a function of the amount by which the predetermined threshold is exceeded. As previously stated, the named executive officers are eligible to participate in Tiers I and II under the 2014 Bonus Plan. Additionally, as previously stated, Tier II is not available until Tier I has been fully funded. Thus, this column assumes adoptionthat Tier I was fully funded. When approved in December 2013, the Tier I pool, which is allocated among all employees based upon relative payroll amounts, was capped at $3,500,000 for fiscal year 2014. Tier I pool is funded by an accrual of this proposal14.2% of any pretax profits in excess of the minimum predetermined threshold (5% return on stockholder equity). When approved in December 2013, the Tier II pool was capped at $3,700,000 for fiscal year 2014. Once the maximum pool amount for Tier I is met, the Tier II pool is funded by an accrual of 14.2% of any pretax profits in excess of the stockholders.Tier I maximum amount until the cap for Tier II is reached.
(5)The restricted stock awards vest in four equal annual installments with the first installment vesting on the first anniversary of the date of grant.

SummaryMaterial Terms of the Amended 1997 PlanPlan-Based Awards

Below is a summary of theThe material terms of the Amended 1997Executive Officer Annual Bonus Plan, the 2014 Bonus Plan and our employee equity incentive plans are described in the footnotes to the2014 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table as well as under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—General—Annual Performance Bonuses” and “Employee Equity Incentive Plans.”

Salary and Bonus in Proportion to Total Compensation

As stated above, the compensation committee seeks to achieve the appropriate balance between immediate cash rewards and incentives for the achievement of both annual and long-term financial and non-financial objectives. The compensation committee believes that our compensation program should be tied in part to our stock price performance so as to align our named executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders. The value of the combined base salary and annual bonus (non-equity awards as described above) for each of our named executive officers represented approximately 31% of their total respective compensation in fiscal year 2014.

26


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

The following table summarizes certain information regarding unexercised options, vested stock and equity incentive plan awards outstanding as of the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 for each of the named executive officers:

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End Table

   Option Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Exercisable
(#)
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options

Unexercisable
(#)
   Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
   Option
Exercise
Price

($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
 

Walter R. Wheeler

   26,000     —       —       (1  (1

Robbin B. Adams

   13,500     —       —       (2  (2

(1)Includes options with an exercise price of $8.78 expiring December 5, 2018; and options with an exercise price of $21.945 expiring February 25, 2020.
(2)Includes options with an exercise price of $8.78 expiring December 5, 2018; and options with an exercise price of $21.945 expiring February 25, 2020.

   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested

(#)(1)
   Market Value
of Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($) (2)
   Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested
   Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Market Value
or Payout Value of
Unearned Shares, Units
or Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
 

Walter R. Wheeler

   15,000     593,550     —       —    

Michael J. Sheen

   10,000     395,700     —       —    

Thomas T. McEntire

   10,000     395,700     —       —    

Robbin B. Adams

   10,000     395,700     —       —    

(1)Restricted shares were granted on November 21, 2013 which vest in four equal annual installments with the first installment vesting on the anniversary date of the date of grant.
(2)Represents the closing price of $39.57 per share of the Company’s stock on September 30, 2014.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table

No stock options were exercised and no stock awards vested during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 for any of our named executive officers.

Pension Benefits

We currently have no defined benefit pension plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We currently have no defined contribution plans which provide for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax qualified.

27


Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

Pursuant to their employment agreements, as amended, each of Messrs. Sheen, McEntire, Wheeler and Adams is entitled to receive the severance benefits described below upon termination of his employment unless the termination:

results from his death, disability or retirement;

is by the Company for Cause; or

is by the employee other than for Good Reason.

“Cause” is defined to mean the employee’s willful and continued failure to perform his duties after a demand for his performance of those duties or the employee’s willfully engaging in gross misconduct materially and demonstrably injurious to the Company. “Good Reason” is defined to mean a demotion, a reduction in base salary, a relocation of the employee’s base location of employment, the discontinuation of any employee benefit without comparable substitution, the failure of any successor of the Company to assume the employment agreement or a purported termination not in compliance with the employment agreement.

The severance benefits to which Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire and Adams would be entitled on termination would be an amount equal to the product of (a) his then-current annual salary plus the average of the bonus payments paid to the executive in respect of the three fiscal years preceding the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, multiplied by (b) two. The executive would also receive any relocation and indemnity payments to which he is entitled and any costs and legal fees incurred in connection with any dispute over his employment agreement, and a gross-up for any applicable “excess parachute payment” tax imposed by the Code.

These payments would be due in a lump sum on the tenth day following the date of termination. The amounts paid are based on the salary rate in effect at the time of termination, unless the employee is terminating employment for Good Reason due to a reduction in salary, in which case the salary rate shall be the rate in effect prior to such reduction.

So long as Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire or Adams are terminated without Cause, neither is required to perform any further agreement or action in order to receive these benefits. However, in connection with these employment agreements, each of them have agreed that he will not disclose or misappropriate any confidential information of the Company and that all intellectual property developed by them is the property of the Company.

If the employment of any of Messrs. Wheeler, Sheen, McEntire or Adams had been terminated on September 30, 2014, the terminated employee would have received the amount set forth in the table below in a lump sum payment plus any relocation and indemnity payments to which he is entitled. In the case of Mr. Sheen, the terminated employee would additionally be entitled to receive any costs and legal fees incurred in connection with any dispute over his employment agreement, and a gross-up for any applicable “excess parachute payment” tax imposed by the Code.

Name

  Lump sum payment
upon termination
 

Walter R. Wheeler

  $978,327  

Michael J. Sheen

  $1,130,787  

Thomas T. McEntire

  $1,076,536  

Robbin B. Adams

  $866,099  

Compensation Risks

We believe that risks arising from our compensation policies and practices for our employees are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the compensation committee believes that the mix and design of the elements of executive compensation do not encourage management to assume excessive risks.

28


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

In fiscal year 2014, the compensation committee was composed of Dr. Thomas L. Davis, Mr. Charles H. Still and Ms. Tina M. Langtry.

The amended charter of the compensation committee may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com.

Compensation Committee Report

The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on such review and discussions, the compensation committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the proxy statement relating to the 2015 annual meeting of stockholders.

The information in this Compensation Committee Report shall not be deemed to be soliciting material, or be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C or to liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate this report by reference.

Thomas L. Davis, Ph.D.

Charles H. Still

Tina M. Langtry

29


PROPOSAL IV: REINCORPORATIONOFTHE COMPANYFROMTHE STATEOF DELAWARETOTHESTATEOF TEXAS

Summary

The principal effects of the proposed reincorporation will be that:

(1)The Company will benefit from approximately $157,000 of Delaware franchise tax savings annually, which the Company believes is likely to increase in the future.

(2)The affairs of the Company will cease to be governed by Delaware corporation laws and will become subject to Texas corporation laws. See “Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation” below.

(3)The resulting Texas corporation (“Geospace Texas”) will be the same entity as the current Delaware corporation (“Geospace Delaware”) and will continue with all of the rights, titles and interests of Geospace Delaware, will continue with the same officers and directors of Geospace Delaware, the rights of creditors of Geospace Delaware will continue to exist, and the ownership interest of the shareholders of Geospace Delaware will be converted to an identical interest in Geospace Texas.

General

The Board has unanimously approved and recommends that the shareholders approve the reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas (the “Reincorporation” or the “Reincorporation Proposal”). The Company would effect the Reincorporation by creating a Texas corporation as a wholly owned subsidiary and adopting an agreement and plan of merger, the proposed form of which is attached hereto asAppendix A (the “Agreement and Plan of Merger”) and filing certificates of merger in both Delaware and Texas. At the effective time of the Reincorporation, the Company would amend the merger subsidiary’s certificate of formation to one that would govern the Company as a Texas corporation going forward, the proposed form of which is attached asAppendix B. The Agreement and Plan of Merger also would adopt bylaws for the resulting Texas corporation going forward, the proposed form of which is attached asAppendix C.

Apart from being governed by the proposed Texas certificate of formation, Texas bylaws and Texas corporation law, for all other purposes, the Company as a Texas corporation will possess the rights, privileges, powers and franchises, the real and mixed property. All debts due to Geospace Delaware will be vested in Geospace Texas, and all debts, liabilities and liens of Geospace Delaware will be the debts, liabilities and liens of Geospace Texas. Geospace Texas will continue with the same officers and directors of Geospace Delaware, the rights of creditors of Geospace Delaware will continue to exist, and the ownership interest of the shareholders of Geospace Delaware will be converted to an identical interest in Geospace Texas. No regulatory approval (other than various filings with Secretary of State of Texas and Delaware discussed above) is required to effect the Reincorporation.

Reasons for the Reincorporation

Because the Company’s headquarters and its principal operations, management and employees are located in Houston, Texas, the Company’s status as a Delaware corporation physically located in Texas requires the Company to comply with reporting and tax obligations in both Delaware and Texas. For the most recent franchise tax period, the Company paid $157,000 in franchise taxes to the State of Delaware. The Company believes that the Delaware legislature will likely increase the rates applicable to the Company in the future, making the annual Delaware franchise tax obligation effectively perpetual. The Company is obligated to pay the same amount of Texas margin tax regardless of where it is incorporated, and the Company’s Texas margin tax obligations will not change as a result of the Reincorporation. Accordingly, the Reincorporation will result in a net savings by the Company of $157,000 annually.

The Company does not conduct any operations in Delaware and does not anticipate doing so in the future other than sales to customers located in Delaware, which at present do not account for an appreciable portion of

30


the Company’s overall sales. The Company does not conduct any operations in any state in the United States other than Texas, other than sales to customers located in those states. Thus, the Company does not believe it receives any material financial benefit as a result of being incorporated in Delaware. The Company also considered its relatively small capitalization and its desire to cut unnecessary costs. If the proposed reincorporation is implemented, Geospace Texas would benefit from a recurring reduction in franchise taxes compared to Geospace Delaware because Geospace Texas would no longer have a franchise tax obligation in Delaware. In addition, since the Company is headquartered in Texas and conducts its primary operations from Texas, the application of Texas corporate laws will be advantageous to the operations and management of the Company.

Furthermore, incorporation in Delaware subjects the Company to the jurisdiction and venue of federal and state courts in Delaware in possible litigation, even though it has no management, employees, or operations there. Delaware courts typically require the retention of Delaware counsel in proceedings there in addition to the Company’s Texas counsel. The Company believes the risk of this potential expense and other hurdles of litigation conducted far from its Houston offices is unwarranted.

The Company believes that the Texas legislature has demonstrated a willingness to maintain modern and effective corporation laws to meet changing business needs. While some regard Delaware corporate law as the most extensive and well-defined body of corporate law in the United States, the Company does not believe there is significant risk to the Company or its shareholders if the Company is governed under Texas corporate law rather than Delaware corporate law. Additionally, the Company regards certain aspects of Delaware law more uncertain and complex than their Texas equivalents due to the large body of nuanced Delaware case law. While there are some advantages under Delaware corporate law to being a Delaware corporation, there are also advantages under Texas corporate law to being a Texas corporation. The Company believes that, on balance, the impact on the Company of implementing the reincorporation proposal from a corporate law perspective will be neutral to the Company and its shareholders.

In preparing the Texas Certificate of Formation and Bylaws that will govern Geospace Texas in the event this proposal is approved by the stockholders, the Company attempted to mirror as closely as possible the stockholder voting thresholds that are currently in effect for Geospace Delaware. In some instances, Texas law does not allow for identical voting thresholds, and in those cases the Company attempted to approximate the stockholder voting thresholds under Delaware law as nearly as possible.

We have provided a discussion of additional differences between the Delaware and Texas corporate laws below under the heading “Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation.”

No Change in Business, Jobs, Physical Location, Etc.

The Reincorporation Proposal will effect a change in the legal domicile of the Company and other changes of a legal nature, the most significant of which are described below under the heading “—Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation.” The Reincorporation Proposal will not result in any change in headquarters, business, jobs, management, location of any of our offices or facilities, number of employees, taxes payable to the State of Texas, assets, liabilities or net worth (other than as a result of the costs incident to the Reincorporation and the Delaware franchise tax savings discussed above). Our management, including all directors and officers, will remain the same in connection with the reincorporation and will have identical positions with Geospace Texas. None of the Company’s subsidiaries will be changing their respective states or jurisdictions of incorporation, or making any other changes, in connection with the reincorporation. To the extent the Reincorporation will require the consent or waiver of a third party (for example, the consent of the Company’s primary lender), the Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such consent or waiver before completing the Reincorporation. If a material consent cannot be obtained, the Company will not proceed with the Reincorporation. The Reincorporation will not otherwise affect any of the Company’s material

31


contracts with any third parties and the Company’s rights and obligations under such material contractual arrangements will continue as rights and obligations of Geospace Texas as a Texas corporation.

Comparison of Shareholder Rights Before and After the Reincorporation

The Reincorporation will effect some changes in the rights of the Company’s shareholders. This is as a result of differences between the Texas Business Organizations Code (“TBOC”) and the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), as well as differences between each of the Company’s charter documents before and after the Reincorporation. Summarized below are the most significant differences between the rights of the Company’s shareholders before and after the Reincorporation. The differences between the current Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws and the proposed Texas certificate of formation and bylaws, as relevant to such rights, are noted within this summary. The summary below is not intended to be relied upon as an exhaustive list of all the differences or a complete description of the differences resulting from the Reincorporation. Furthermore, this summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full textDGCL, the Company’s existing Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the TBOC, and the Company’s proposed Texas certificate of formation and bylaws.

Delaware

Texas

Business Combinations Statute

The DGCL prohibits certain transactions between a Delaware corporation and an “interested stockholder” for a period of three years after the date the interested stockholder acquired its stock.

“Interested stockholder” is broadly defined as a person (including the affiliates and associates of such person) that is directly or indirectly a beneficial owner of 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation.

Prohibited transactions include: (i) mergers, (ii) consolidations, (iii) sales or other dispositions of assets having an aggregate market value of 10% or more of either the consolidated assets or the outstanding stock of a company, and (iv) certain transactions that would result in the issuance or transfer of stock of a company, increase the interested stockholder’s proportionate share of ownership in a company, or grant the interested stockholder disproportionate financial benefits.

The DGCL provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the

The TBOC prohibits specific mergers, sales of assets, reclassifications and other transactions between a Texas public corporation and an “affiliated shareholder” for a period of three years after the date the shareholder obtained “affiliated shareholder” status.

“Affiliated shareholder” is defined as a person who beneficially owns (or has owned within the preceding three-year period) 20% or more of the outstanding stock of a Texas public corporation for a period of three years following the shareholder acquiring shares representing 20% or more of the corporation’s voting power.

The TBOC provides an exception to this prohibition if: (i) the board of directors of the corporation approves the transaction or the acquisition of shares by the affiliated shareholder prior to the affiliated shareholder becoming an affiliated shareholder, (ii) two-thirds (or a higher if specified in the certificate of formation) of the unaffiliated shareholders approve the transaction at a meeting held no earlier than six months after the shareholder acquires that

32


Delaware

Texas

business combination or the transaction in which the stockholder became an interested stockholder is approved by that company’s board of directors prior to the date the interested stockholder became an interested stockholder, (ii) the interested stockholder acquired at least 85% of the voting stock of that company in the transaction in which it became an interested stockholder, or (iii) the business combination is approved by a majority of the board of directors and the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast by disinterested stockholders at an annual or special meeting (and not by written consent).

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation does not alter the effect of the Delaware business combinations statute.

ownership, or (iii) if the affiliated shareholder was an affiliated shareholder before December 31, 1996, and continued as such through the date of the transaction.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation does not alter the Texas business combinations statute.

Sales, Leases, Exchanges or Other Dispositions

A Delaware corporation may sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of its property and assets when and as authorized by a majority of the outstanding stock of the corporation entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation provides to the contrary.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation does not address this issue.

Generally, the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, of the property and assets of a Texas corporation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation entitled to vote. No such approval is required, however, if the transaction is made in the usual and regular course of the corporation’s business. Under Texas law, the transfer of substantially all of a corporation’s assets in such a manner that the corporation continues directly or indirectly to engage in one or more businesses is deemed to be in the usual and regular course of its business.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation contains a provision setting the approval threshold at a majority of the outstanding shares.

33


Delaware

Texas

Approval of Mergers

Under Delaware law, any merger with a third party must be approved by a majority of the stockholders.

Under Texas law, any merger with a third party requires approval by two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Texas corporation unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation contains a provision setting the approval threshold at a majority of the outstanding shares.

Appraisal Rights

Under Delaware law, stockholders have no appraisal rights in the event of a merger or consolidation of the corporation if the stock of the Delaware corporation is listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of its listing on the NASDAQ market) or if such stock is held of record by more than 2,000 stockholders. Stockholders of a Delaware parent corporation have no appraisal rights in a merger between that parent corporation and a subsidiary corporation wholly owned by that parent corporation. Even if appraisal rights would not otherwise be available under Delaware law in the cases described above, stockholders would still have appraisal rights if they are required by the terms of the agreement of merger and consolidation to accept for their stock anything other than:

(1) shares of stock;

(A) of the surviving corporation; or

(B) of any other corporation which shares at the effective date of the merger or consolidation will be either listed on a national securities exchange or held of

Except for the limited classes of mergers, consolidations, sales and asset dispositions for which no shareholder approval is required under Texas law, shareholders of Texas corporations with voting rights have dissenters’ rights in the event of a merger, consolidation, conversion, sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all, or substantially all, the property and assets of the corporation. However, a shareholder of a Texas corporation has no dissenters’ rights with respect to any plan or merger or conversion in which there is a single surviving or new domestic or foreign corporation, or with respect to any plan of exchange if:

(1) the ownership interest, or a depository receipt in respect of the ownership interest, held by the owner is part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are, on the record date set for purposes of determining which owners are entitled to vote on the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate:

(A) listed on a national securities exchange (the Company currently meets this condition by virtue of

34


Delaware

Texas

record by more than 2,000 stockholders;

(2) cash in lieu of fractional shares; or

(3) a combination of such shares and such cash.

Otherwise, stockholders of a Delaware corporation have appraisal rights in consolidations and mergers.

Under Delaware law, any corporation may provide in its certificate of incorporation that appraisal rights will also be available as a result of an amendment to its certificate of incorporation, any merger or consolidation involving such corporation, or the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of the corporation.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation has no such provisions.

its listing on the NASDAQ market); or

(B) held of record by at least 2,000 owners;

(2) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration that is different from the consideration to be provided to any other holder of an ownership interest of the same class or series as the ownership interest held by the owner, other than cash instead of fractional shares or interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; and

(3) the owner is not required by the terms of the plan of merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, to accept for the owner’s ownership interest any consideration other than:

(A) ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, of a another entity of the same general organizational type that, immediately after the effective date of the merger, conversion, or exchange, as appropriate, will be part of a class or series of ownership interests, or depository receipts in respect of ownership interests, that are:

(i) listed on a national securities exchange or authorized for listing on the exchange on official notice of issuance;

(ii) held of record by at least 2,000 owners;

(B) cash instead of fractional ownership interests the owner would otherwise be entitled to receive; or

35


Delaware

Texas

(C) any combination of the ownership interests and cash above.

Shareholder Consent to Action Without a Meeting

Under Delaware law, unless otherwise provided in the certificate of incorporation, any action that can be taken at a meeting of the stockholders can be taken without such meeting if written consent thereto is signed by the holders of outstanding stock having the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were presented and voted.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation prohibits stockholder action by written consent.

Under Texas law, any action that may be taken at a meeting of the shareholders may be taken without a meeting if written consent thereto is signed by all the holders of shares entitled to vote on that action. The certificate of formation of a Texas corporation may provide that action by written consent in lieu of a meeting may be taken by the holders of that number of votes which would be required to take the action which is the subject of the consent at a meeting at which each of the shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation does not allow shareholder action by written consent in lieu of a meeting unless the written consent is signed by all holders of the shares entitled to vote on that action.

Procedures for Filling Vacant Directorships

Under Delaware law, unless the certificate of incorporation or bylaws provide otherwise, vacancies and newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation requires the vote of two-thirds of the directors then in office, although less than a quorum, or by a sole remaining director to fill vacancies.

Under Texas law, any vacancy occurring in the board of directors may, unless otherwise authorized by a corporation’s certificate of formation, fill a vacancy or a newly created vacancy in a director position only: (i) by the affirmative vote of the majority of the directors then in office, (ii) by the sole remaining director, or (iii) by the affirmative vote of the shareholders.

A directorship to be filled because of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by the shareholders or by the board of directors for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the shareholders. The board of directors may not fill more than

36


Delaware

Texas

two such directorships during the period between any two successive annual meetings of shareholders. The proposed Texas certificate of formation and bylaws are consistent with the TBOC.

Right to Call Meetings

Delaware law provides that special meetings of the stockholders may be called by the board of directors or such other persons as are authorized in the certificate of incorporation or bylaws.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation provides that special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer or the board of directors pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the directors. Stockholders may not, therefore, call a special meeting.

Unlike in Delaware, under Texas law, shareholders are guaranteed the right to call special meetings. Unless otherwise specified in the corporation’s certificate of formation, holders of not less than 10% of all of the shares entitled to vote at the proposed meeting have the right to call a special shareholders’ meeting. The certificate of formation may allow for special meetings to be called by a number of shares greater than or less than 10%, but it may not set the required number of shares above 50%. The president, board of directors, or any other person authorized to call special meetings by the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation may also call special shareholders’ meetings.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation sets the percentage of shareholders required to call a special meeting at fifty percent of those shareholders entitled to vote on the subject matter for which the meeting is called (unlike the Delaware standard, where shareholders may not call a special meeting). The bylaws provide that special meetings of the shareholders may also be called by the President, the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, or the board of directors pursuant to a resolution approved by a majority of the directors.

37


Delaware

Texas

Voting by Proxy

Under Delaware law, a stockholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such stockholder by proxy. A proxy is valid for three years from its date unless otherwise provided in the proxy.Under Texas law, a shareholder may authorize another person or persons to act for such shareholder by proxy. A proxy is only valid for eleven months from its date unless otherwise provided in the proxy.

Charter Amendments

Delaware law provides that amendments to the certificate of incorporation must be approved by the holders of a majority of the corporation’s stock entitled to vote thereon, unless the certificate of incorporation provides for a greater number.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Company then entitled to vote in an election of directors, voting as a single class to amend the charter provisions relating management of the Company.

Under Texas law, an amendment to the certificate of formation requires the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the corporation, unless a different threshold, not less than a majority, is specified in the certificate of formation.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation does not provide for a different threshold.

Bylaw Amendments

Under Delaware law, stockholders of a corporation entitled to vote have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws. If the corporation’s certificate of incorporation so provides, the corporation’s board of directors also has the have the right to amend, repeal or adopt the bylaws.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation provides that the existing Delaware bylaws may be amended, repealed, altered or adopted (i) by stockholder action with the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all the shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class or (ii) by director action with the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office.

Generally, under Texas law, the board of directors may amend, repeal or adopt a corporation’s bylaws. However, a corporation’s certificate of formation may reserve this power exclusively to a majority of the shareholders. Similarly, the shareholders, in amending, repealing or adopting a particular bylaw, may expressly provide that the board of directors may not amend, readopt or repeal that bylaw. Texas caselaw permits the corporation to increase the required threshold of shareholders necessary to amend the bylaws.

The proposed Texas certificate of incorporation, consistent with the Delaware certificate of incorporation, allow amendments to the bylaws by the vote of at least two-thirds of the board of directors or by two-thirds of the holders of the outstanding shares entitled to vote.

38


Delaware

Texas

Removal of Directors

Under Delaware law, subject to the exceptions discussed below, a majority of stockholders then entitled to vote at an election of directors may remove a director with or without cause.

If the board of directors of a Delaware corporation is classified (i.e., elected for staggered terms), a director may only be removed for cause, unless the corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides otherwise.

If a corporation uses cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, no director may be removed without cause if the votes cast against his or her removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s certificate of incorporation provides that separate classes or series of stockholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered.

Neither the existing Delaware certificate of incorporation nor bylaws allow: (i) the removal of directors, other than for cause, (ii) cumulative voting, or (iii) the election of separate directors by separate classes or series of stockholders voting as such a class or series.

Under Texas law, subject to the exceptions discussed below or as otherwise provided by the certificate of formation or bylaws of a corporation, the shareholders may remove a director, with or without cause, by a vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at an election of the directors.

If the corporation’s directors serve staggered terms, a director may not be removed except for cause unless the certificate of formation provides otherwise.

If the certificate of formation permits cumulative voting and less than the entire board is to be removed, a director may not be removed if the votes cast against the removal would be sufficient to elect him or her if cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of directors. Where a corporation’s certificate of formation provides that separate classes or series of stockholders are entitled, as such a class or series, to elect separate directors, in calculating the sufficiency of votes for removal of such a director, only the votes of the holders of such a class or series are considered.

The proposed Texas bylaws are consistent with the existing Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws on this issue.

Number of Directors

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that the number of directors will be fixed from time to time in accordance with the bylaws by the vote of two-thirds of the directors, but there shall not be less than three nor more than 12 directors.The proposed bylaws provide for no fewer than three and no more than 12 members of the corporation’s board of directors.

39


Delaware

Texas

Inspection of Books and Records

Under Delaware law, any stockholder may inspect the corporation’s books and records upon written demand under oath stating the purpose of the inspection. If the corporation refuses to permit inspection or does not reply to the demand within five business days after the demand has been made, the stockholder may apply to the Court of Chancery for an order to compel such inspection.Under Texas law, a shareholder may, upon written demand stating a proper purpose, inspect the books and records of a corporation if such shareholder holds at least 5% of the outstanding shares of stock of the corporation or has been a holder of shares for at least six months prior to such demand.

Distributions and Dividends

Under Delaware law, a corporation may, subject to any restrictions contained in its certificate of incorporation, pay dividends out of surplus and, if there is not surplus, out of net profits for the current and/or the preceding fiscal year, unless the capital of the corporation is less than the capital represented by issued and outstanding stock having preferences on asset distributions.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation provides that dividends may be declared and paid or set apart for payment upon the Company’s common stock out of any assets or funds of the Company legally available for the payment of dividends and may be payable in cash, stock or otherwise.

Under Texas law, a distribution is defined as a transfer of cash or other property (except a corporation’s own shares or rights to acquire its shares), or an issuance of debt, by a corporation to its shareholders in the form of: (i) a dividend on any class or series of the corporation’s outstanding shares, (ii) a purchase or redemption, directly or indirectly, of its shares, or (iii) a payment in liquidation of all or a portion of its assets.

Under Texas law, a corporation may not make a distribution if such distribution violates its certificate of formation or, unless the corporation is in receivership, if it either renders the corporation unable to pay its debts as they become due in the course of its business or affairs, or exceeds, depending on the type of distribution, either the net assets or the surplus of the corporation.

Stock Redemption and Repurchase

Under Delaware law, a corporation may purchase or redeem shares of any class except when its capital is impaired or would be impaired by such purchase or redemption. A corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital, shares that are entitled upon anyAs noted above, under Texas law, the purchase or redemption by a corporation of its shares constitutes a distribution. Accordingly, the discussion above relating to distributions is applicable to stock redemptions and repurchases.

40


Delaware

Texas

distribution of its assets to a preference over another class or series of its stock, or, if no shares entitled to such a preference are outstanding, any of its own shares, if such shares are to be retired and the capital reduced.

Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Delaware law permits a corporation to indemnify directors, officers, employees, or agents against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with an action, suit or proceeding, other than an action by or in the right of the corporation, to which such director, officer, employee or agent may be a party, provided such a director, officer, employee or agent acted in good faith and reasonably believed: (i) in the case of a civil, administrative or investigative proceeding, that his or her conduct was in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, or (ii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, that he or she had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

In connection with an action by or in the right of the corporation against a director, officer, employee or agent, the corporation has the power to indemnify such director, officer, employee or agent for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such suit: (i) if such person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and (ii) if such person is found liable to the corporation, only if ordered by a court of law. Section 145 of the DGCL provides that such section is not exclusive

Texas law permits a corporation to indemnify a director or former director, against judgments and expenses reasonably and actually incurred by the person in connection with a proceeding if the person: (i) acted in good faith, (ii) reasonably believed, in the case of conduct in the person’s official capacity, that the person’s conduct was in the corporation’s best interests, and otherwise, that the person’s conduct was not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and (iii) in the case of a criminal proceeding, did not have a reasonable cause to believe the person’s conduct was unlawful.

If, however, the person is found liable to the corporation, or is found liable on the basis he received an improper personal benefit, then indemnification under Texas law is limited to the reimbursement of reasonable expenses actually incurred and no indemnification will be available if the person is found liable for: (i) willful or intentional misconduct in the performance of the person’s duty to the corporation, (ii) breach of the person’s duty of loyalty owed to the enterprise, or (iii) an act or omission not committed in good faith that constitutes a breach of a duty owed by the person to the corporation.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation and bylaws provide for indemnification of directors and officers (including advancement

41


Delaware

Texas

of any other indemnification rights, which may be granted by a corporation to its directors, officers, employees or agents.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide for indemnification of directors and officers (including advancement of expenses) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

of expenses) to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

Procedure for Indemnification

Delaware law provides that a determination that indemnification of a director or officer is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of directors who are not party to the proceeding, even though less than a quorum, (ii) by a committee of such directors designated by majority vote of such directors, even though less than a quorum, (iii) if there are no such directors or if such directors so direct, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (iv) by stockholder vote.Texas law provides that a determination that indemnification is appropriate must be made: (i) by a majority vote of the directors who, at the time of the vote, are disinterested and independent, regardless of whether such directors constitute a quorum, (ii) by a majority vote of a special committee of the board of directors if the committee is designated by a majority vote of the directors who at the time of the vote are disinterested and independent and is composed solely of one or more directors who are disinterested and independent, (iii) by special legal counsel selected by majority vote under (i) or (ii) above, (iv) by the shareholders in a vote that excludes those shares held by directors who, at the time of the vote, are not disinterested and independent, or (v) by a unanimous vote of the shareholders of the corporation.
Mandatory IndemnificationDelaware law requires indemnification for expenses actually and reasonably incurred with respect to any claim, issue or matter on which the director is successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding.Under Texas law, indemnification by the corporation for reasonable expenses actually incurred is mandatory only if the director is wholly successful on the merits or otherwise, in the defense of the proceeding.

Insurance

Delaware law allows a corporation to purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer,Texas law is substantially the same as Delaware law for this issue.

42


Delaware

Texas

employee or agent of the corporation against any liability asserted against such person and incurred by such person in such a capacity or arising out of his status as such a person. This is so, regardless of whether the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against that liability.

Under Delaware law, a corporation may also establish and maintain arrangements, other than insurance, to protect such persons, including a trust fund or surety arrangement.

Persons Covered

Delaware law provides the same indemnification rights to officers, employees and agents that it provides for directors.Texas law expressly and separately addresses the indemnification of officers, employees and agents. The corporation may indemnify and advance expenses to an officer, employee or agent as provided by the corporation’s governing documents, general or specific action of the board of directors, resolution of the shareholders, contract, or common law. The corporation must indemnify an officer to the same extent as a director. The procedure for indemnification under Texas law summarized above need not be followed for officers, employees or agents.
Standard of CareIn general, directors are charged with the duty in their decision-making process and oversight responsibilities to act as would a reasonably prudent person in the conduct of such person’s own affairs.Texas law is substantially the same as Delaware law for this issue.

Limited Liability of Directors

Delaware law permits the adoption of a provision in the certificate of incorporation limiting or eliminating the monetary liability of a director toTexas law permits a corporation to eliminate in its certificate of formation all monetary liability of a director to the corporation or its shareholders for conduct in the

43


Delaware

Texas

a corporation or its stockholders by reason of a director’s breach of the fiduciary duty of care.

Delaware law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) breaching the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) failing to act in good faith, (iii) engaging in intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iv) obtaining an improper personal benefit from the corporation, or (v) declaring an illegal dividend or approving an illegal stock purchase or redemption.

The existing Delaware certificate of incorporation eliminates the monetary liability of a director to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

performance of such director’s duties.

Texas law does not, however, permit any limitation of the liability of a director for: (i) a breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its shareholders, (ii) an act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of the person to the corporation or involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) a transaction from which the director obtains an improper benefit, or (iv) a violation of applicable statutes which expressly provide for the liability of a director.

The proposed Texas certificate of formation eliminates the monetary liability of a director to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law.

Fiduciary Duties of Directors

Delaware imposes duties of care and loyalty on directors of Delaware corporations, subject to the business judgment rule which provides a presumption that a director acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief that the action taken was in the best interests of the corporation. Delaware imposes liability upon directors who willfully or recklessly disregard their duties as directors so as to constitute an utter failure to carry out their fiduciary duties.

Directors of a Delaware corporation owe fiduciary duties both to the stockholders and the corporation.

Texas imposes duties of loyalty, care and obedience on directors of Texas corporations, but will generally not, absent fraud, impose liability upon a non-interested director unless the action challenged is outside of the expressed purpose of the corporation or inconsistent with an express limitation on authority.

Directors of a Texas corporation owe fiduciary duties only to the corporation.

Shareholder Rights Plans

Delaware courts have generally allowed the use of shareholder rights plans by a corporation if their adoption is reasonable in response to a reasonably identified threat posed.Texas statutorily approves shareholder rights plans.

44


Delaware

Texas

Considerations of Directors

Delaware does not have a statute stating what constituencies the board may consider when making decisions.Texas corporate law includes statutory approval of directors considering both the long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and the shareholders.
Shareholder ActionsDelaware allows certain lawsuits to be brought against directors directly by shareholders, in some instances, without making a demand on the corporation’s board. Generally, lawsuits are tried before a Delaware chancellor without a jury.Texas generally requires that lawsuits against directors be brought derivatively by the corporation only after making demand on the corporation’s board setting out the contours of the demand. Texas law may, in certain circumstances, such as in a proceeding determining liability of directors, allow for a jury trial.

Mechanism for Reincorporation into Texas

The process for changing the Company from a Delaware corporation to a Texas corporation will be for the Company to form a wholly-owned subsidiary in the State of Texas and to merge the Company into the Texas subsidiary by adopting the Agreement and Plan of Merger. The Agreement and Plan of Merger calls for the surviving Texas corporation to adopt the proposed Texas certificate of formation, which will be the certificate of formation of the Plan andCompany after the Amendment which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Exhibit A.Reincorporation.

AdministrationStock and Equity Incentive Awards

The Amended 1997At the effective time of the Reincorporation, each outstanding share of Common Stock of Geospace Delaware will automatically be converted into one share of common stock of Geospace Texas. If you hold physical stock certificates, you do not have to exchange your existing stock certificates of the Company for stock certificates of the resulting Texas corporation; however, after the Reincorporation, any shareholder desiring a new form of stock certificate may submit the existing stock certificate to Computershare, the Company’s transfer agent, for cancellation and obtain a new certificate by contacting Computershare at 800-962-4284. Pursuant to the Agreement and Plan is administered byof Merger, the Compensation Committeeresulting Texas corporation will assume all of the Company’s Board or another committee (or a subcommittee thereof), each appointed byobligations under the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) that is comprised solely of two or more non-employee directors who also qualify as “outside directors” (within the meaning assigned to such term under Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”)) and as “Non-Employee Directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.

The Committee will have full authority, subject to the terms of the AmendedCompany’s 1997 Plan, to establish rules and regulations for the proper administration of the Amended 1997 Plan, to select the employees to whom awards are granted, and to set the dates of grants, the types of awards that shall be made (whether Non-statutoryKey Employee Stock Options or Incentive Stock Options) and the other terms of the awards. When granting awards, the Committee will consider such factors as an individual’s duties and present and potential contributions to our success and such other factors as the Committee in its discretion shall deem relevant. The Committee may also correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Amended 1997 Plan or in any agreement relating to an award in the manner and to the extent it shall deem expedient to carry it into effect.

Number of Shares Subject to the Amended 1997Option Plan and Award Limits

The aggregate maximum2014 Long Term Incentive Plan. Each outstanding option to purchase shares of Common Stock under these plans will be converted into an option to purchase an equal number of shares of Common Stockthe resulting Texas corporation’s common stock on the same terms and conditions as in effect immediately prior to the Reincorporation. Each other award (restricted stock is the only other type of award currently outstanding) will be converted to an equivalent award with the same terms issued by the Texas corporation.

Effective Time

If the Reincorporation Proposal is approved, the Reincorporation will become effective upon the filing of, and at the date and time specified in (as applicable), a certificate of merger filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and a Texas certificate of merger and the Texas certificate of formation filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas, in each case upon acceptance thereof by the Delaware Secretary of State and the Texas Secretary of State. If the Reincorporation Proposal is approved, it is anticipated that the Company will cause the Reincorporation to be effected as promptly as reasonably possible following such approval. However, the Reincorporation may be issued underdelayed by the Amended 1997Board or the Agreement and Plan is 2,250,000 shares (adjusted to reflect the Stock Split) (the “Plan Share Limit”). Asof Merger may be terminated or abandoned by action of the date of this proxy statementBoard at any time prior to the number of shares of Common Stock remaining available for issuance under the Amended 1997 Plan (subject to stockholder approvaleffective time of the Amended 1997 Plan) was 184,350 shares. The number of shares of Common Stock that are the subject of awards under the Amended 1997 Plan which are forfeited or terminated,reincorporation,

 

545


expire unexercised, are settled in cash in lieu of shares of Common Stockwhether before or in a manner such that all or some of the shares covered by an award are not issued to a participant or are exchanged for awards that do not involve shares will again immediately become available to be issued pursuant to awards granted under the Amended 1997 Plan. If shares of Common Stock are withheld from payment of an award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the award, those shares will be treated as shares that have been issued under the Amended 1997 Plan and will not again be available for issuance under the Amended 1997 Plan. If shares of Common Stock are tendered in payment of an option price of an option, those shares will not be available for issuance under the Amended 1997 Plan.

The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Amended 1997 Plan is also 2,250,000 shares (adjusted to reflect the Stock Split). The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to options granted in any one calendar year to any one employee is 800,000 shares (as adjusted following the Stock Split), determined as of the dates of grant.

The limitations described above may be adjusted upon a subdivision or consolidation of shares of Common Stock or other capital readjustment, the payment of a stock dividend on Common Stock, or other increase or reduction in the number of shares of Common Stock outstanding without receipt of consideration by the Company.

Eligibility

All of our (and our affiliates’) key employees are eligible to participate in the Amended 1997 Plan. The selection of those employees from among those eligible, who will receive Incentive Stock Options and Non-statutory Stock Options or any combination thereof is within the discretion of the Committee. However, Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to our key employees and key employees of our subsidiary corporations. We currently have six executive officers and approximately 75 other employees who would be eligible to participate in the Amended 1997 Plan.

Term of the Amended 1997 Plan

The Amendment will be effective as of May 2, 2013, the date of its adoption by the Board, and will retroactively extend the term of the Plan from its original expiration of November 14, 2007 to November 14, 2017, provided the Amendment is approved by our stockholders at the Special Meeting. No further awards may be granted under the Amended 1997 Plan after November 14, 2017, and the Amended 1997 Plan will terminate thereafter once all awards have been satisfied, exercised or expire. The Board in its discretion may terminate the Amended 1997 Plan at any time with respect to any shares of Common Stock for which awards have not theretofore been granted.

Stock Options

a. Term of Option. The term of each option will be as specified by the Committee at the date of grant but shall not be exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant. The effect of the termination of an optionee’s employment, consulting relationship, or membership on the Board will be specified in the option agreement that evidences each option grant.

b.Option Price. The option price will be determined by the Committee and may not be less than the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the date that the option is granted.

c.Repricing Restrictions. Except for adjustments for certain changes in the Common Stock, the Committee may not, without the approval of our stockholders, amend any outstanding option agreement that evidences an option grant to lower the option price (or cancel and replace any outstanding option agreement with an option agreement having a lower option price). In addition, the Committee may not lower the option price (or cancel and replace any outstanding option agreement with an option agreement having a lower option price) to the extent that doing so would subject the holder to additional taxes under Section 409A of the Code (“Section 409A”).

6


d.Special Rules for Certain Stockholders. If an Incentive Stock Option is granted to an employee who then owns, directly or by attribution under the Code, stock possessing more than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes our stock or the stock of a subsidiary of ours, then the term of the option may not exceed five years, and the option price will be at least 110% of the fair market value of the shares on the date that the option is granted.

e.Size of Grant. Subject to the limitations described above under the section “Number of Shares Subject to the Amended 1997 Plan and Award Limits,” the number of shares for which an option is granted to an employee will be determined by the Committee.

f.Status of Options. The status of each option granted to an employee as either an Incentive Stock Option or a Non-statutory Stock Option will be designated by the Committee at the time of grant. Unless an option is specifically characterized by the Committee as an Incentive Stock Option it will be a Non-statutory Stock Option. If, however, the aggregate fair market value (determined as of the date of grant) of shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options become exercisable for the first time by an employee exceeds $100,000 in any calendar year, the options with respect to the excess shares will be Non-statutory Stock Options.

g.Payment. The option price upon exercise may be paid by an optionee in any combination of the following: (a) cash, certified check, bank draft or postal or express money order for an amount equal to the option price under the option, (b) an election to make a cashless exercise through a registered broker-dealer (if approved in advance by the Committee or one of our executive officers) or (c) any other form of payment which is acceptable to the Committee.

h.Option Agreement. All options will be evidenced by a written agreement containing provisions consistent with the Amended 1997 Plan and such other provisions as the Committee deems appropriate. The terms and conditions of the respective option agreements need not be identical. The Committee may, with the consent of the participant, amend any outstanding option agreement in any manner not inconsistent with the provisions of the Amended 1997 Plan, including amendments that accelerate the exercisability of the option.

Corporate Change and Other Adjustments

The Amended 1997 Plan provides that, upon a Corporate Change (as hereinafter defined), the Committee generally may accelerate the vesting of options, cancel options and cause us to make payments in respect thereof in cash, or adjust the outstanding options as appropriate to reflect such Corporate Change (including, subject to certain conditions, having some or all of the then outstanding options (whether vested or unvested) assumed or having a new award of a similar nature substituted for some or all of their then outstanding options under the Amended 1997 Plan (whether vested or unvested) by an entity which is a party to the transaction resulting in such Corporate Change). The Amended 1997 Plan provides that a Corporate Change occurs if (i) we are not the surviving entity in any merger or consolidation or other reorganization (or we survive only as a subsidiary of an entity other than an entity that was directly or indirectly wholly-owned by us immediately prior to such merger, consolidation or other reorganization), (ii) we sell, lease or exchange all or substantially all of our assets to any other person (other than an entity that is directly or indirectly wholly owned by us), or (iii) we are to be dissolved. With respect to awards under the Amended 1997 Plan other than options, upon changes in our capitalization the Committee generally may make appropriate adjustments to the awards.

The maximum number of shares that may be issued under the Amended 1997 Plan and the maximum number of shares that may be issued to any one individual and the other individual award limitations, as well as the number and price of shares of Common Stock or other consideration subject to an award under the Amended 1997 Plan, will be appropriately adjusted by the Committee in the event of changes in the outstanding Common Stock by reason of recapitalizations, reorganizations, mergers, consolidations, combinations, split-ups, split-offs, spin-offs, exchanges or other relevant changes in capitalization or distributions to the holders of Common Stock occurring after an award is granted.

7


Transferability

An Incentive Stock Option is not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution, and may be exercised during the employee’s lifetime only by the employee or such employee’s guardian or legal representative. All other awards under the Amended 1997 Plan are not transferable other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution.

Amendments

The Board may from time to time amend the Amended 1997 Plan; however, any change that would impair the rights of a participant with respect to an award theretofore granted will require the participant’s consent. Further, without the prior approval of our stockholders, the Board may not amend the Amended 1997 Plan to change the class of eligible individuals, increase the number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Amended 1997 Plan, or amend or delete the provisions of the Amended 1997 Plan that prevent the Committee from amending any outstanding option agreement to lower the option price (or cancel and replace any outstanding option agreement with an option agreement having a lower option price).

Federal Income Tax Aspects of the Amended 1997 Plan

The following discussion summarizes certain material U.S. Federal income tax consequences to us and U.S. holders with respect to the acquisition, ownership, exercise or disposition of awards which may be granted under the Amended 1997 Plan. The discussion is based upon the provisions of the Code and the regulations and rulings promulgated thereunder, all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect) or different interpretations. This summary reflects generally contemplated consequences and does not purport to deal with all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation that may be relevant to an individual award holder’s situation, nor any tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction.

Incentive Stock Options. Incentive Stock Options are subject to special federal income tax treatment. No federal income tax is imposed on the optionee upon the grant or the exercise of an Incentive Stock Option if the optionee does not dispose of the shares acquired pursuant to the exercise within the two-year period beginning on the date the option was granted or within the one-year period beginning on the date the option was exercised (collectively, the “holding period”). In such event, the Company would not be entitled to any deduction for federal income tax purposes in connection with the grant or exercise of the option or the disposition of the shares so acquired. With respect to an Incentive Stock Option, the difference between the fair market value of the stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price must generally be included in the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income for the year in which such exercise occurs. However, if the optionee exercises an Incentive Stock Option and disposes of the shares received in the same year and the amount realized is less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise, then the amount included in alternative minimum taxable income will not exceed the amount realized over the adjusted basis of the shares.

Upon disposition of the shares received upon exercise of an Incentive Stock Option after the holding period, any appreciation of the shares above the exercise price should constitute long-term capital gain. If an optionee disposes of shares acquired pursuant to his or her exercise of an Incentive Stock Option prior to the end of the holding period, the optionee will be treated as having received, at the time of disposition, compensation taxable as ordinary income. In such event, and subject to the application of Section 162(m) as discussed below, we may claim a deduction for compensation paid at the same time and in the same amount as compensation is treated as received by the optionee. The amount treated as compensation is the excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise (or in the case of a sale in which a loss would be recognized, the amount realized on the sale if less) over the exercise price; any amount realized in excess of the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise would be treated as short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on the holding period of the shares.

8


Non-statutory Stock Options. As a general rule, no federal income tax is imposed on the optionee upon the grant of a Non-statutory Stock Option, and we are not entitled to a tax deduction by reason of such grant. Generally, upon the exercise of a Non-statutory Stock Option, the optionee will be treated as receiving compensation taxable as ordinary income in the year of exercise in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares of stock at the time of exercise over the option price paid for such shares. Upon the exercise of a Non-statutory Stock Option, and subject to the application of Section 162(m) as discussed below, we may claim a deduction for compensation paid at the same time and in the same amount as compensation income is recognized by the optionee assuming any federal income tax reporting requirements are satisfied.

Upon a subsequent disposition of the shares received upon exercise of a Non-statutory Stock Option, any difference between the fair market value of the shares at the time of exercise and the amount realized on the disposition would be treated as capital gain or loss. If the shares received upon the exercise of an option are transferred to the optionee subject to certain restrictions, then the taxable income realized by the optionee, unless the optionee elects otherwise, and our tax deduction (assuming any federal income tax reporting requirements are satisfied) should be deferred and should be measured at the fair market value of the shares at the time the restrictions lapse. The restrictions imposed on officers, directors and 10% stockholders by Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act is such a restriction during the period prescribed thereby if other shares have been purchased by such an individual within six months of the exercise of a Non-statutory Stock Option.

Section 162(m).Generally, Section 162(m) precludes a public corporation from taking a deduction for annual compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to its covered employees (as defined in Section 162(m)). Our Section 162(m) covered employees are the principal executive officer and our three next highest-paid officers other than the principal financial officer. The Section 162(m) deduction limitation does not apply to certain performance-based compensation that satisfies certain requirements of Section 162(m). The Amended 1997 Plan is intended to permit the Committee to grant certain Non-statutory stock options to covered executive officers that is intended to constitute qualified performance-based compensation for purposes of Section 162(m). However, we can provide no assurances that the Internal Revenue Service would agree that certain of the Relevant Options (as defined below in Proposal 2) are exempt from the Section 162(m) deduction limitation, whether or not the stockholders approve of the Amendment to the Plan.

The Amended 1997 Plan is not qualified under Section 401(a) of the Code. Based upon current law and published interpretations, we do not believe that the Amended 1997 Plan is subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

The comments set forth in the above paragraphs are only a summary of certain of the Federal income tax consequences relating to the Amended 1997 Plan. No consideration has been given to the effects of state, local, or other tax laws on the Amended 1997 Plan or award recipients.

Parachute Payment Sanctions. Certain provisions of the Amended 1997 Plan or provisions included in an award agreement may afford a recipient special protections or payments which are contingent on a change in the ownership or effective control of us or in the ownership of a substantial portion of our assets. To the extent triggered by the occurrence of any such event, these special protections or payments may constitute “parachute payments” that, when aggregated with other parachute payments received by the recipient, if any, could result in the recipient receiving “excess parachute payments” (a portion of which would be allocated to those protections or payments derived from the award). We would not be allowed a deduction for any such excess parachute payments, and the recipient of the payments would be subject to a nondeductible 20% excise tax upon such payments in addition to income tax otherwise owed.

Required Vote

This proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of a simple majorityCompany’s shareholders, if the Board determines for any reason, in its sole judgment and discretion, that the consummation of the stockholders who, being entitled to do so, vote in personReincorporation should be delayed or by proxy on this proposal at the Meeting.

The Board of Directors recommends voting “FOR” this proposal.

9


PROPOSAL 2 : RATIFICATIONOF OPTIONS GRANTED UNDERTHE 1997 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLAN

In connection with a review of the Plan, the Company realized that certain options detailed below (the “Relevant Options”) had been granted by the Company in 2008 and 2010 pursuant to the Plan after the Plan’s 2007 expiration date. The Company now requests that the stockholders ratify the grant of the Relevant Options as having been granted pursuant to the Plan in accordance with their terms. The Relevant Options have been consistently reported in each of the Company’s periodic reports and proxy statements since the dates of grant of the Relevant Options. The Board and the Company’s management believe that ratification of the grant of the Relevant Options by the Company’s stockholders as having been granted pursuant to the Plan iswould be inadvisable or not in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders because it assures avoidanceshareholders, as the case may be.

Effect of Not Obtaining the potential negative impacts of failure to approve the Relevant Options discussed below under the heading “Potential Impacts of Failure of our Stockholders to Approve the Relevant Options.”

The Company is requesting that stockholders ratify the grants of the Relevant Options under the Plan in order to ensure compliance with NASDAQ rules applicable to listed companies. Pursuant to the authority granted the Board under the Plan, the Board has already approved the extension of the Plan’s term to November 14, 2017, and has ratified and approved the grants of the Relevant Options under the Plan.

Relevant OptionsRequired Vote for Approval

The Relevant Options provideIf the holder withReincorporation Proposal fails to obtain the rightrequisite vote for approval, the Reincorporation will not be consummated and the Company will continue to purchase the Company’s Common Stock in an amount and at the exercise price set forthbe incorporated in the table below. Each option expires ten years from its dateState of grant, and vests in four equal annual installments beginning one year following the date of grant. The average market values of the Company’s Common Stock on applicable dates of grant, December 5, 2008, February 25, 2010 and August 5, 2010 were $8.78; $21.95 and $26.48, respectively. The Relevant Options have terms as detailed in the following summary table:

Date of Grant

  Exercise Price   Aggregate Number of
Shares Granted (1)
   Number of Optionees 

December 5, 2008

  $8.78     292,000     37  

February 25, 2010

  $21.95     40,000     2  

August 5, 2010

  $26.48     86,000     9  

(1)Adjusted for the Company’s 2-for-1 split of its Common Stock effected in the form of a stock dividend (the “Stock Split”).

10


While it is not possible to predict with certainty the amounts of awards that may be granted under the Amended 1997 Plan, the following is a summary of the Relevant Options (which includes all of the options set forth in the table above) granted in the past:

Amended 1997 Plan Benefits

 

Name and Position

  Dollar Value ($) (1)   Number of Shares 

Gary D. Owens,

Chief Executive Officer

  $4,092,280     70,000  

Michael J. Sheen,
Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer

  $3,287,005     60,000  

Thomas T. McEntire,
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

  $3,533,457     50,000  

Walter R. Wheeler,
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

  $966,840     26,000  

Robbin B. Adams,
Executive Vice President and Chief Project Engineer

  $832,090     26,000  

Executive Group

  $12,711,672     232,000  

Non-Executive Director Group

     0  

Non-Executive Officer Employee Group

  $8,751,135     186,000  

(1)Amounts in this column represent the aggregate value of stock-based compensation granted in the past pursuant to the Plan, based on (i) the actual value realized upon exercise for options which have been exercised or (ii) an estimate of the value of Company’s stock price at $75.00 for options which have not yet been exercised. The actual value that a recipient may realize or has realized depends on the excess of our stock price over the exercise price on the date the options are exercised.

Potential Impacts of Failure of Stockholders to Ratify the Grants of the Relevant Options

The Board believes that the Company may be exposed to the following risks if the grants of the Relevant Options are not approved by our stockholders:

1.Because of the NASDAQ determination letter received by the Company and the Company’s plan to regain compliance with NASDAQ listing rules that require stockholder ratification of the Relevant Options, failure to gain such approval may cause the Company’s Common Stock to be de-listed from the NASDAQ exchange, which would result in decreased liquidity for the Company’s Common Stock.

2.Certain employees were granted Relevant Options pursuant to stock option agreements signed by both the Company and the employees that indicated the grants were made under the Plan. The Company believes that if the Relevant Options are not approved by the stockholders, the Company will face exposure to claims by certain of the impacted employees that they are due cash option cancellation payments. The Company estimates that the magnitude of this potential exposure would be approximately $10 million, however this amount may vary significantly depending on the price of the Company’s Common Stock.

3.The Company may have additional liability under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), resulting from the exercise and subsequent sale of Common Stock acquired under the Relevant Options by Company employees prior to the approval of the Amendment.

11


Interaction of this Proposal 2 with Proposal 1, above, to Amend the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan

Proposal 1 described above retroactively amends the Plan to be effective continuously from 1997 until 2017, which would include the period during which the Relevant Options were granted. While the Company continues to believe that its prior presentation of a single proposal was consistent with the applicable rules, the Company has separated the matter of the adoption of the amendment to the Plan (which is contained in Proposal 1) from the ratification of the grant of the Relevant Options (Proposal 2). The Company will treat the two proposals as separate.

Required Vote

This proposal requires approval by the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the stockholders who, being entitled to do so, vote in person or by proxy on this proposal at the Meeting.Delaware.

The Board of Directors recommends voting “FOR” this proposal.

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a general code of business conduct that applies to all employees, and a supplemental code of ethics that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. The general code of business conduct and supplemental code of ethics may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

The Company does not have a formal policy, written or unwritten, with respect to related person transactions. However, the Company’s general code of business conduct, to which all employees (including our executive officers) are subject, provides that no employee nor any employee’s immediate family member should engage in a business or financial arrangement with a vendor, supplier or customer of the Company without the prior written approval of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. The Board of the Company does not review, approve or ratify these types of transactions or any other related person transactions. The general code of business conduct may be accessed electronically under the “Investor Relations—Code of Business Conduct” section of the Company’s website at www.geospace.com.

Transactions involving Richard F. Miles

The Company regularly transacts business with CMS Creative Marketing Services, LP (“CMS”), a company owned by the spouse of director Richard F. Miles. Mr. Miles’ spouse is president and owner of CMS, a marketing company, which has for some time provided marketing communications support services to the Company, including product photography, video shoots, brochure design, magazine advertising, website design and various other marketing and advertising services. In addition, CMS also designs and produces the Company’s annual report. The Company had retained CMS prior to Mr. Miles’ appointment as director in 2013. For the Company’s 2012, 2013, and 2014 fiscal years, the Company paid $134,543, $152,191, and $215,300, respectively, to CMS for these services.

Mr. Miles was previously the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of Directors of Geokinetics Inc. (“Geokinetics”), a customer of the Company. On November 8, 2012, Mr. Miles retired from his positions with Geokinetics. Between October 1, 2011 and the date of Mr. Miles’ retirement from Geokinetics, the Company sold an aggregate amount of $3.8 million of equipment to Geokinetics in 139 separate transactions, and the Company rented equipment to Geokinetics in seven separate transactions with an aggregate rental fee of $7.1 million. The transactions were on terms similar to those that the Company would provide to customers of Geokinetics’ size. During this period, Geokinetics was not indebted to the Company except for payment terms generally provided to customers of the Company relating to Geokinetics’ purchases of equipment.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers, directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the regulation to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.

 

1246


Based solely on a review of reports on those filings furnished to the Company and written representations from reporting persons that no additional reports were required, the Company believes that during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, all officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all filing requirements applicable to them.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Any stockholder or other interested party wishing to send written communications to any one or more members of the Company’s Board of Directors may do so by sending them to the Company Secretary, c/o Geospace Technologies Corporation, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601. All such communications will be forwarded to the intended recipient(s).

Proposals for Next Annual Meeting; Other Matters

Any appropriate proposals of holders of Common Stock intended to be presented at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held in 20142016 must be received by the Company at its principal executive offices, 7007 Pinemont Drive, Houston, Texas 77040-6601, no later than September 5, 20139, 2015 to be included in the proxy statement and form of proxy relating to that meeting. A matter as to which the Company receives notice that is proposed to be brought before the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company in 20142016 outside the process of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rule on stockholder proposals (described in the preceding sentence) will be considered not properly brought before that meeting, and will be out of order, unless the notice as to that matter meets the requirements of the advance notice provisions of the Company’s by-laws. That provision requires notice of any matter, including nomination of a director, to be submitted by a stockholder at the annual meeting of stockholders of the Company in 20142016 to be received by the Company no later than November 21, 2013,February 7, 2016, and to be received by the Company no earlier than October 24, 2013,10, 2015, subject to certain other requirements and deadlines outlined in the Company’s by-laws.

The cost of solicitation of proxies in the accompanying form will be paid by the Company. In addition to solicitation by use of the mails, the directors, officers or employees of the Company may solicit the return of proxies by telephone, electronically or in person.

 

1347


EXHIBITAppendix A

AMENDMENT NO. 6 TOAGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER


AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER

OF

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

1997 KEY EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTION PLANAND

TEXAS GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

THIS AMENDMENTAGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER (this “Agreement”) is entered into by and between Geospace Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Texas Geospace Technologies Corporation, a Texas corporation (“Subsidiary”), as of the     day of             , 2015.

WHEREAS, Parent owns all of the outstanding shares of each class of capital stock of Subsidiary;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of Parent has declared it advisable and to the advantage, welfare, and best interests of the Parent and its stockholders to merge Parent with and into Subsidiary pursuant to the provisions of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”) and the provisions of the Texas Business Organizations Code (“TBOC”), with Subsidiary being the surviving corporation upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth;

WHEREAS, the board of directors of Parent have approved this Agreement and directed that the Agreement be and submitted to the stockholders of Parent for their consideration and approval, and such stockholders have approved this Agreement;

WHEREAS, Parent, in its capacity as the sole shareholder of Subsidiary, has adopted this Agreement; and

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, the parties agree as follows:

1. Merger.

1.01 Parent shall, pursuant to the provisions of Section 253 of the DGCL and 10.006 of the TBOC, be merged with and into Subsidiary (the “Merger”), which shall be the surviving corporation from and after the date on which a certificate of merger is filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (the “Effective Time”), and which shall continue to exist under the name Geospace Technologies Corporation (the Company“Surviving Corporation”). under the laws of the State of Texas. The Merger shall have the effects set forth in the TBOC, the DGCL and this Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing sentence, and subject thereto, at the Effective Time:

(a) the separate existence of the Parent and the Subsidiary shall cease;

(b) all rights, title, and interests to all real estate and other property owned by the Parent and the Subsidiary is allocated to and vested, subject to any existing liens or other encumbrances on the property, in the Surviving Corporation without: reversion or impairment; any further act or deed; or any transfer or assignment having occurred;

(c) all liabilities and obligations of the Parent and the Subsidiary are allocated to the Surviving Corporation;

(d) the Surviving Corporation shall be the primary obligor for such liabilities or obligations;

(e) the Surviving Corporation shall be substituted in any proceeding pending by or against the Parent or the Subsidiary;

(f) all acts, plans, policies, contracts, approvals and authorizations of the Parent and the Subsidiary and each of its respective officers and agents, which were valid and effective immediately prior to the Effective

A-2


Time shall be taken for all purposes as the acts, plans, policies, contracts, approvals and authorizations of the Surviving Corporation and shall be effective and binding thereon as the same were with respect to the Parent and Subsidiary prior to the Merger, and the employees of the Parent and Subsidiary shall become the employees of the Surviving Corporation and continue to be entitled to the same rights and benefits which they enjoyed as employees of the Parent and the Subsidiary; and

(g) the assets, liabilities, reserves and accounts of the Parent and the Subsidiary shall be recorded on the books of the Surviving Corporation at the amounts at which they, respectively, shall then be carried on the books of the Parent or the Subsidiary subject to such adjustments or eliminations of intercompany items as may be appropriate in giving effect to the Merger.

2. Certificate of Formation; Name.

WThe Certificate of Formation of Subsidiary, as in force and effect prior to the Effective Time, shall be amended and superseded in its entirety by the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation attached hereto asAnnex I T N E S S E T H:, which Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation shall become, at the Effective Time, the articles of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter duly amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law. The name of the Surviving Corporation shall be “Geospace Technologies Corporation.”

WHEREAS3. Bylaws.

The bylaws of Subsidiary, as in force and effect prior to the Effective Time, shall be amended and superseded in its entirety by the bylaws attached hereto asAnnex II, effectivewhich Bylaws shall become, at the Effective Time, the articles of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter duly amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law.

4. Directors and Officers.

The directors and officers of the Parent in office at the Effective Time shall be the directors and officers of the Surviving Corporation in office at the Effective Time, all of whom shall hold their offices for the balance of the term for which such individual was elected a director of Parent until the election and qualification of their respective successors or until their earlier removal, resignation or death in accordance with the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation.

5. Exchange of Capital Stock.

(a) At the Effective Time, each issued and outstanding share of common stock, $0.001 par value per share of Parent (the “Geospace Delaware Shares”) shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder thereof be converted into one fully paid and non-assessable common share, par value $0.001 per share of the Surviving Corporation (the “Geospace Texas Shares”).

(b) Each Geospace Delaware Share held in treasury of Parent immediately prior to the Effective Time shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of Parent, be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and shall not be converted into shares or other securities of the Surviving Corporation or the right to receive cash or any other property or rights.

(c) Each Geospace Texas Share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date and Time shall, by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of Pike (Delaware), be cancelled and retired and shall cease to exist, and shall not be converted into shares or other securities of the Surviving Corporation or the right to receive cash or any other property or rights.

(d) At and after the Effective Time, each share certificate which immediately prior to the Effective Time represented outstanding Geospace Delaware Shares (a “Delaware Certificate”) shall be deemed for all purposes to evidence ownership of, and to represent, the number of Geospace Texas Shares into which the Geospace Delaware Shares represented by such Delaware Certificate immediately prior to the Effective Time have been converted

A-3


pursuant to this Agreement. The registered holder of any Delaware Certificate outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, as such holder appears in the books and records of November 15, 1997,Parent, or of the Boardtransfer agent in respect of Directorsthe Geospace Delaware Shares, immediately prior to the Effective Time, shall, until such Delaware Certificate is surrendered for transfer or exchange, have and be entitled to exercise any voting and other rights with respect to and to receive any dividends or other distributions on the Geospace Texas Shares into which the Geospace Delaware Shares represented by any such Delaware Certificate have been converted pursuant Agreement.

(e) Each holder of OYOa Delaware Certificate shall, upon the surrender of such Delaware Certificate to Surviving Corporation, or the transfer agent in respect of the Geospace Texas Shares, for cancellation after the Effective Time, be entitled to receive from the Surviving Corporation, adoptedor the OYOtransfer agent in respect of the Geospace Texas Shares, a certificate (a “Texas Certificate”) representing the number of Geospace Texas Shares into which the Geospace Delaware Shares represented by such Delaware Certificate have been converted pursuant to this Agreement. If any such Texas Certificate is to be issued in a name other than that in which the Delaware Certificate surrendered for exchange is registered, such exchange shall be conditioned upon (i) the Delaware Certificate so surrendered being properly endorsed or otherwise in proper form for transfer and (ii) the person requesting such exchange either paying any transfer or other taxes required by reason of the issuance of the Texas Certificate in a name other than that of the registered holder of the Delaware Certificate surrendered, or establishing to the satisfaction of the Surviving Corporation, or the transfer agent in respect of the Geospace Texas Shares, that such tax has been paid or is not applicable.

(f) Where no Delaware Certificate has been issued in the name of a holder of Geospace Texas Shares, a “book entry” (i.e., a computerized or manual entry) shall be made in the shareholder records of the Surviving Corporation to evidence the issuance to such holder of an equal number of Geospace Texas Shares.

6. Equity Plans.

(a) As of the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation hereby assumes each of: (i) the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan“1997 Plan”);

WHEREAS (ii) the 2014 Long Term Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”, and collectively with the name1997 Plan, the “Equity Plans”). The Surviving Corporation shall perform all of OYO GeospaceParent’s outstanding obligations under the Equity Plans and any related award agreements upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as set forth in the Equity Plans and related award agreements as in effect at the Effective Time. The Surviving Corporation has been changed to Geospace Technologies Corporation;

WHEREAS, the Board of Directorsshall reserve for purposes of the Company has determinedEquity Plans a number of Geospace Texas Shares equal to amend and readopt the Plan to extendnumber of Geospace Delaware Shares reserved by Parent for issuance under the termEquity Plans as of the Plan, to reflectEffective Time.

(b) Each outstanding option under the change in nameEquity Plans shall, by virtue of the Company,Merger and without any action of the part of the holder of such option, be converted into and become an option to make certain other technical revisionspurchase the same number of Geospace Texas Shares, as applicable, at the same option price per share and upon the same terms and subject to the Plan;same conditions as set forth in the applicable plan and any related award agreement as in effect at the Effective Time.

(c) Geospace Texas Shares shall become issuable upon the vesting of restricted shares and awards of the restricted stock units granted under the 2014 Plan by virtue of the Merger and without any action on the part of the holder of any such restricted share, restricted stock unit or share, upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as set forth in the applicable plan and any related award agreement as in effect at the Effective Time.

(d) The Surviving Corporation shall assume each of Parent’s other employee benefit plans and arrangements and the obligations of Parent thereunder upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions as set forth in such plans and arrangements as in effect at the Effective Time.

7. Execution, Filing and Recordation.

Parent and Subsidiary agree that they will cause to be executed and filed and recorded any document or documents prescribed by the laws of the State of Delaware and the State of Texas and that they will cause to be performed all necessary acts within the State of Delaware, the State of Texas and elsewhere to effectuate the merger herein provided for.

A-4


WHEREAS,8. Miscellaneous.

(a) This Agreement shall be submitted to the stockholders of the Company previously approved the reservation of 1,250,000 shares of the Common Stock of the CompanyParent for issuance under the Plan;

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2012, the Company declared a two-for-one stock split in the form of a stock dividend of shares of the Common Stock of the Company payable to the holders of Common Stock of the Company of record on October 15, 2012;their consideration and

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has adopted this Amendment contingent upon the approval of the stockholders of the Company.

NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THATthe Plan is amended, readopted and extended as follows:

(1) Section 1.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:

1.2 EFFECTIVE DATE OF PLAN. The Plan is effective November 15, 1997, if within one year of that date it shall have been approved by at least a majority vote of stockholders voting in person or by proxy adoption at a duly held stockholder’s meeting, or if the provisions of the corporate charter, by-laws or applicable state law prescribes a greater degree of stockholder approval for this action, the approval by the holders of that percentage, at a duly held meeting of stockholders. No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan after November 14, 2017.

(2) Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Section 2.2:

2.2 “AWARD” means any Nonqualified Option, Incentive Option or Restricted Stock award granted under the Plan.

(3) Section 2.6 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:

2.6 “COMPANY” means Geospace Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation.

(4) Section 2.14 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:

2.6 “PLAN” means the Geospace Technologies Corporation 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan as it may be amended from time to time.

A-1


(5) Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Section 2.18:

2.18 “SECTION 409A” means section 409A of the Code and other guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Code.

(6) Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by adding thereto the following new Section 2.19:

2.19 “SHARE” means a share of Common Stock of the Company.

(7) Article II of the Plan is hereby amended by changing the Section numbers of the Sections to reflect the addition of the new Sections pursuant to this amendment.

(8) Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to provide as follows:

4.2 DEDICATED SHARES. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.5, the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan shall be 1,125,000 Shares (2,250,000 Shares following the stock split in the form of a stock dividend on October 18, 2012). The Shares that are available for issuance under the Plan may be issued in any form of any Award authorized under the Plan. Any Shares that are the subject of Awards under the Plan that are forfeited or terminated, expire unexercised, are settled in cash in lieu of Shares or in a manner such that all or some of the Shares covered by an Award are not issued to a Participant or are exchanged for Awards that do not involve Shares shall again immediately become available to be issued pursuant to Awards granted under the Plan. If Shares are withheld from payment of an Award to satisfy tax obligations with respect to the Award, such Shares shall be treated as Shares that have been issued under the Plan, and the number of such Shares shall not again be available for issuance under the Plan. If Shares are tendered in payment of an option price of an Option, such Shares shall not be available for issuance under the Plan.

The following rules shall apply to grants of Awards under the Plan:

(i)Incentive Stock Options. The aggregate number of Shares with respect to which Incentive Stock Options may be granted under the Plan is 1,125,000 Shares (2,250,000 Shares following the stock split in the form of a stock dividend on October 18, 2012).

(ii)Options. The maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be subject to Options granted in any one calendar year to any one employee shall be 400,000 Shares (800,000 Shares following the stock split in the form of a stock dividend on October 18, 2012) determined as of the date of grant.

(iii)Adjustments. Each of the foregoing numerical limits stated in this Section 4.2 shall be subject to adjustmentstockholders in accordance with the provisions of Section 4.5.

(9) Article V252 of the Plan is herebyDGCL and Section 10.006 and Section 21.452 of the TBOC.

(b) Subject to applicable law, this Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented by adding theretowritten agreement of the following new Section 5.9:

5.9 RESTRICTIONS ON REPRICING AND EXTENSIONS OF EXERCISABILITY OF OPTIONS. Except as provided in Section 4.5,Parent and the Committee may not, without approvalSubsidiary, after authorization of such action by the Boards of Directors of the Parent and the Subsidiary, at any time prior to the filing of articles of merger or a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Texas and with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, respectively, except that after the adoption of this Agreement by the stockholders of Parent, there shall be no amendments to this Agreement that would: (a) alter or change the Company, amendamount or kind of shares or other property or rights to be received by the holders of any outstanding Optionclass or series of shares of the Parent or the Subsidiary in the Merger; (b) alter or change any term of the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation or the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Surviving Corporation to be effected by the Merger; or (c) alter or change any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement if such alteration or change would adversely affect the holders of any class or series of shares of the Parent or the Subsidiary.

(c) The Surviving Corporation agrees that it may be served with process in the State of Delaware in any proceeding for enforcement of any obligation of Parent, as well as for enforcement of any obligation of the Surviving Corporation arising from the Merger, and the Surviving Corporation irrevocably appoints the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as the Surviving Corporation’s agent to loweraccept service of process in any such suit or other proceeding; a copy of such process shall be mailed by the option price (or cancelSecretary of State of the State of Delaware to:

GeospaceTechnologies Corporation
7007Pinemont Drive
Houston,TX 77040
Attn:Chief Financial Officer

(d) If, at any time after the Effective Time, the Surviving Corporation shall consider or be advised that any further conveyances, assignments, transfers, deeds or other instruments or further acts are necessary or proper (a) to vest, perfect or confirm, of record or otherwise, in the Surviving Corporation, title to and replacethe possession of any outstanding Optionproperty or right of Parent acquired or to be acquired by reason of, or as a result of, the Merger, or (b) otherwise to carry out the purposes of this Agreement, Parent and its proper officers and directors shall be deemed to have granted hereby to the Surviving Corporation an irrevocable power of attorney to execute and deliver all such further conveyances, assignments, transfers, deeds and other instruments and to do all such further acts as are necessary and proper to vest, perfect or confirm title to and the possession of such property or right in the Surviving Corporation and otherwise to carry out the purposes of this Agreement; and the proper officers and directors of the Surviving Corporation are hereby fully authorized in the name of Parent or otherwise to take any and all such actions as contemplated by this provision.

9. Termination.

This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the filing thereof with Option Agreements havingthe Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of State of the State of Texas upon a lower option price)vote of directors of either Parent or Subsidiary notwithstanding approval of this Agreement by the stockholders of Parent or the sole shareholder of Subsidiary. In the event of such termination, this Agreement shall forthwith become void and neither party nor its respective officers, directors or stockholders shall have any liability hereunder.

[The remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank.]

A-5


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement and Plan of Merger as of the date first written above.

PARENT:

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

By:

Name:

Title:

SUBSIDIARY:

TEXAS GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

By:

Name:

Title:

[Signature page to Agreement and Plan of Merger]


Appendix B

TEXAS CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION


AMENDEDAND RESTATED

CERTIFICATEOF FORMATION

OF

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

ARTICLE I

NAME

1.1 The name of the corporation is Geospace Technologies Corporation (the “Corporation”).

ARTICLE II

DURATION

2.1 The Corporation shall have a perpetual existence. This document shall become effective when filed with the Secretary of State of Texas.

ARTICLE III

PURPOSE

3.1 The purpose for which the Corporation is organized is to transact any or all lawful business for which corporations may be organized under the Texas Business Organizations Code.

ARTICLE IV

SHARES AND SHAREHOLDERS

The total number of shares of stock of all classes which the Corporation has authority to issue is twenty-one million (21,000,000) shares, of which twenty million, (20,000,000) shares shall be common stock, with a par value of $.01 per share (“Common Stock”), and one million (1,000,000) shares shall be preferred stock, with a par value of $.01 per share (“Preferred Stock”). Further,The designations and the Committeepowers, preferences and rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of the shares of each class of stock are as follows:

4.1 Preferred Stock may not lower an option pricebe issued from time to time by the Board of an Option (or cancelDirectors as shares of one or more series. Subject to the provisions hereof and replacethe limitations prescribed by law, the Board of Directors is hereby vested with the authority and is expressly authorized, prior to issuance, by adopting resolutions providing for the issuance of, or providing for a change in the number of, shares of any outstanding Option Agreement with Option Agreements having a lower option price)particular series and, if and to the extent from time to time required by law, by filing a certificate pursuant to the Texas Business Organizations Code (or other law hereafter in effect relating to the same or substantially similar subject matter), to establish or change the number of shares to be included in each such series and to determine the designations, preferences, limitations, and relative rights, including voting rights, of each such series, all to the maximum extent permitted by the Texas Business Organizations Code as in effect on the date hereof or as hereafter amended.

4.2 Except where otherwise set forth in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of any series of Preferred Stock, the number of shares comprising such series may be increased or decreased (but not below the number of shares then outstanding) from time to time by like action of

B-2


the Board of Directors, and fractional shares may be issued. The shares of Preferred Stock of any one series shall be identical with the other shares in such series in all respects except as to the dates from and after which dividends thereon shall cumulate, if cumulative. Shares of any series of Preferred Stock that doing so wouldhave been redeemed (whether through the operation of a sinking fund or otherwise) or purchased by the Corporation, or which, if convertible or exchangeable, have been converted into, or exchanged for, shares of stock of any other class or classes or any evidences of indebtedness shall have the status of authorized and unissued shares of Preferred Stock and may be reissued as a part of the series of which they were originally a part or may be reclassified and reissued as part of a new series of Preferred Stock to be created by resolution or resolutions of the Board of Directors or as part of any other series of Preferred Stock, all subject to the Employeeconditions or restrictions on issuance set forth in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors providing for the issuance of any series of Preferred Stock and to any filing required by law. The number of authorized shares of Preferred Stock may be increased or decreased by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the stock of the Corporation entitled to vote without the separate vote of holders of Preferred Stock as a class.

4.3 Subject to all of the rights of the Preferred Stock, and except as may be expressly provided with respect to the Preferred Stock herein, by law or by the Board of Directors pursuant to this Article IV:

(a) dividends may be declared and paid or set apart for payment upon Common Stock out of any assets or funds of the Corporation legally available for the payment of dividends and may be payable in cash, stock or otherwise;

(b) the holders of Common Stock shall have the exclusive right to vote for the election of directors and on all other matters requiring stockholder action, each share being entitled to one vote; and

(c) upon the voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation, the net assets of the Corporation shall be distributed pro rata to the holders of Common Stock in accordance with their respective rights and interests.

4.4 No holder of any stock of the Corporation shall be entitled as such, as a matter of right, to subscribe for or purchase any part of any new or additional taxes under Section 409A.issue of stock of any class whatsoever of the Corporation, or of securities convertible into stock of any class whatsoever, whether now or hereafter authorized, or whether issued for cash or other consideration or by way of dividend. No holder of any stock of the Corporation shall have the right of cumulative voting at any election of directors or upon any other matter.

4.5 Special meetings of the shareholders may be called by the president, the Board of Directors, any other person authorized to call special meetings by the Bylaws of the Corporation, or by the holders of at least fifty percent of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at such a meeting.

4.6 The exercisabilityholders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation having voting power with respect to a subject matter (excluding shares held by the Corporation for its own account) present or represented by proxy shall constitute a quorum at the meeting of shareholders for the transaction of business with respect to such subject matter; provided, that in the case of a special meeting called by shareholders, the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Corporation entitled to vote on a subject, represented in person or by proxy, shall be required for a quorum.

4.7 The shareholder vote required for approval of a merger, interest exchange, conversion, or sale of all or substantially all of the Corporation’s assets or any other fundamental business transaction is the affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon.

4.8 Any action required or permitted to be taken by the shareholders of the Corporation must be effected at a duly called annual or special meeting of such shareholders and may not be effected by any consent in writing by such shareholders unless such consent is unanimous.

B-3


ARTICLE V

LIABILITY OF GOVERNING PERSONS

5.1 No director or officer of the Corporation shall be liable to the Corporation or any of its shareholders for monetary damages for an Optionact or omission in such person’s capacity as a director or officer except that this Article V shall not authorize the elimination or limitation of liability of a director or officer of the Corporation to the extent he or she is found liable for:

(a) A breach of duty of loyalty, if any, to the Corporation or its shareholders;

(a) An act or omission not in good faith that constitutes a breach of duty of such director or officer to the Corporation or an act or omission that involves intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of the law;

(b) A transaction from which such director or officer received an improper benefit, regardless of whether the benefit resulted from an action taken within the scope of the director’s or officer’s office; or

(c) An act or omission for which the liability of a director or officer is expressly provided by an applicable statute.

5.2 If the Texas Business Organizations Code or any other applicable Texas statute hereafter is amended to authorize the further elimination or limitation of the liability of directors or officers of the Corporation, then the liability of a director or officer of the Corporation shall be extendedlimited to the fullest extent permitted by the Texas Business Organizations Code and such other applicable Texas statute, as so amended, and such limitation of liability shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, the limitation on the liability of a director or officer of the Corporation provided by the foregoing provisions of this Article V.

5.3 Any repeal of or amendment to this Article V shall be prospective only and shall not adversely affect any limitation on the liability of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or amendment.

ARTICLE VI

INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 Each director or officer of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the Texas Business Organizations Code as in effect on the date hereof or as hereafter amended (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such extension would subjectamendment permits the EmployeeCorporation to additional taxes underprovide broader indemnification rights than said law permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such amendment), against all expenses, (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators. The right to indemnification conferred in this Section 409A.shall be a contract right in consideration of a director’s service to the Corporation and may be relied upon by a director as consideration for such director’s service, and shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition; provided, however, that, if the Texas Business Organizations Code requires, the payment of such expenses incurred by a director or officer in his or her capacity as a director or officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by such person while a director or officer, including, without limitation, service to an employee benefit plan) in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding, shall be made only upon delivery to

 

A-2B-4


the Corporation of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that such director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified under the applicable provisions of the Texas Business Organizations Code. The Corporation may, by action of its Board of Directors, provide indemnification to employees and agents of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation with the same scope and effect as the foregoing indemnification of directors and officers.

6.2 The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided in this Article VI, shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any agreement, vote of shareholders, vote of disinterested directors, insurance arrangement or otherwise, both as to action in such person’s official capacity and as to action in another capacity.

6.3 The Corporation shall be obligated at all times to maintain the effectiveness of Bylaw provisions providing for the mandatory indemnification of the directors of the Corporation to the maximum extent permitted by the Texas Business Organizations Code.

6.4 Any repeal of or amendment to this Article VI shall be prospective only and shall not adversely affect any indemnification of a director or officer of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or amendment.

ARTICLE VII

REGISTERED OFFICE AND REGISTERED AGENT

7.1 The address of the Corporation’s registered office is 1021 Main Street, Suite 1150, Houston, TX 77002, and the name of its registered agent at such address is CT Corporation System.

ARTICLE VIII

DIRECTORS

8.1 The number of directors constituting the current board of directors is seven (7). The Board of Directors shall be divided into three classes that have staggered terms of office, and each class shall include the same or a similar number of directors as each other class, with each class serving a term of three years. The names and addresses of the persons who are to serve as the initial directors (and if the bylaws provide for classes of directors, the year in which such directors’ terms shall expire) until the next annual meeting at which their term expires or until their successors are elected and qualified are:

Name

Address

Year of Expiration of

Term

Gary D. Owens

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2016

William H. Moody

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2016

Thomas L. Davis

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2017

Richard F. Miles

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2017

Michael J. Sheen

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2018

Charles H. Still

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2018

Tina M. Langtry

7007 Pinemont Drive

Houston, Texas 77040

2018

B-5


ARTICLE IX

BYLAW AMENDMENTS

9.1 The Board of Directors shall have the power to make, alter, amend and repeal the Bylaws (except so far as the Bylaws adopted by the shareholders shall otherwise provide). Any Bylaws made by the Board of Directors under the powers conferred hereby may be altered, amended or repealed by the directors or by the shareholders; provided, however, that the Bylaws shall not be altered, amended or repealed and no provision inconsistent therewith shall be adopted (i) by shareholders action without the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the voting power of all the shares of the Corporation entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class or (ii) by director action without the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds (rounded up to the nearest whole number) of the directors then in office.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation effective as of this      day of                     , 2015.

By:

Name:

Title:

B-6


Appendix C

TEXAS BYLAWS


BYLAWS

OF

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION

(a Texas Corporation)

ARTICLE I

OFFICES

1.1 The Corporation shall at all times maintain a registered office in the State of Texas.

1.2 The Corporation may also have offices at such other places within or outside of the State of Texas as the Board of Directors shall from time to time appoint or the business of the Corporation require.

ARTICLE II

CAPITAL STOCK

2.1 The Board of Directors may authorize the issuance of the capital stock of the Corporation at such times, for such consideration, and on such terms and conditions as the Board may deem advisable, subject to any restrictions and provisions of law, the Certificate of Formation, as amended and restated from time to time (the “Certificate of Formation”), of the Corporation or any other provisions of these Bylaws.

2.2 The shares of the Corporation shall be represented by certificates, provided that the Board of Directors may provide by resolution or resolutions that some or all of any or all classes or series of its stock shall be uncertificated shares. Any such resolution shall not apply to shares represented by a certificate until such certificate is surrendered to the Corporation. Notwithstanding the adoption of such a resolution by the Board of Directors, every holder of stock represented by certificates and upon request every holder of uncertificated shares shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name of the Corporation by, the chairman or vice-chairman of the Board of Directors, or the president or vice-president, and by the treasurer or an assistant treasurer, or the secretary or an assistant secretary of the Corporation representing the number of shares registered in certificate form. Any or all of the signatures on the certificate may be a facsimile. In case any officer, transfer agent or registrar who has signed or whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased to be such officer, transfer agent or registrar before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the Corporation with the same effect as if he were such officer, transfer agent or registrar at the date of issue. The certificates shall otherwise be in such form as may be determined by the Board of Directors, shall be issued in numerical order, shall be entered in the books of the Corporation as they are issued and shall exhibit the holder’s name and number of shares.

2.3 The shares of the capital stock of the Corporation are transferable only on the books of the Corporation upon surrender, in the case of certificated shares, of the certificates therefor properly endorsed for transfer, or otherwise properly assigned, and upon the presentation of such evidences of ownership of the shares and validity of the assignment as the Corporation may require.

2.4 The Corporation shall be entitled to treat the person in whose name any share of stock is registered as the owner thereof for purposes of dividends and other distributions in the course of business or in the course of recapitalization, consolidation, merger, reorganization, liquidation, or otherwise, and for the purpose of votes, approvals and consents by shareholders, and for the purpose of notices to shareholders, and for all other purposes whatsoever, and shall not be bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in such share on the part of any other person, whether or not the Corporation shall have notice thereof, save as expressly required by the laws of the State of Texas, including the Texas Business Organizations Code, as the same exists or may hereafter be amended (the “TBOC”).

C-2


2.5 The Board of Directors may appoint one or more transfer agents and registrars, and may require certificates for shares to bear the signature of such transfer agent(s) and registrar(s).

2.6 Upon the presentation to the Corporation of a proper affidavit attesting the loss, destruction or mutilation of any certificate for shares of stock of the Corporation, the Board of Directors may direct the issuance of a new certificate or uncertificated shares in lieu of and to replace the certificate so alleged to be lost, destroyed or mutilated. The Board of Directors may require as a condition precedent to the issuance of a new certificate or uncertificated shares any or all of the following: (a) additional evidence of the loss, destruction or mutilation claimed; (b) advertisement of the loss in such manner as the Board of Directors may direct or approve; (c) a bond or agreement of indemnity, in such form and amount and with such surety (or without surety) as the Board of Directors may direct or approve; and (d) the order or approval of a court.

ARTICLE III

SHAREHOLDERS AND MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS

3.1 All meetings of shareholders shall be held at such place within or outside of the State of Texas as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of meeting.

3.2 The annual meeting of shareholders of the Corporation shall be held on such date and at such time as is fixed by the Board of Directors and stated in the notice of meeting. Directors shall be elected in accordance with the provisions of the Certificate of Formation of the Corporation and these Bylaws and such other business shall be transacted as may properly come before the meeting.

3.3 The annual meeting of shareholders may be adjourned by the presiding officer of the meeting for any reason (including, if the presiding officer determines that it would be in the best interests of the Corporation to extend the period of time for the solicitation of proxies) from time to time and place to place until the presiding officer shall determine that the business to be conducted at the meeting is completed, which determination shall be conclusive.

3.4 At an annual meeting of shareholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be (a) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, (b) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder of the Corporation pursuant toSection 3.14(a) hereof.

3.5 A special meeting of shareholders may be called by the President, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman of the Board, the Board of Directors, or the holders of a percentage of shares entitled to vote at such special meeting specified in the Certificate of Formation. The record date for determining which shareholders of the Corporation are entitled to call a special meeting shall be the date upon which the Board of Directors determines, in good faith after reasonable investigation, that shareholders holding at least 50% (or such other threshold specified in the Certificate of Formation) of the outstanding shares entitled to vote at such a meeting have called a special meeting. Thereafter, such shareholders may deliver notice of such special meeting not later than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of such special meeting set by such shareholders to the remaining shareholders entitled to vote at such special meeting. The notice of every special meeting of shareholders shall state the purpose for which it is called. At any special meeting of shareholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall be provided for in the notice to shareholders of the special meeting. Any special meeting of shareholders may be adjourned by the presiding officer of the meeting for any reason (including, if the presiding officer determines that it would be in the best interests of the Corporation to extend the period of time for the solicitation of proxies) from time to time and from place to place until the presiding officer shall determine that the business to be conducted at the meeting is completed, which determination shall be conclusive. In the event the Corporation calls a special meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board of Directors, any shareholder entitled to vote in such election may nominate a person or persons for election by following the procedure set forth inSection 3.14(b) hereof.

C-3


3.6 Except as provided by TBOC § 21.456, written notice (which may include notice by electronic transmission) stating the place, day and hour of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, the purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called, shall be delivered not less than ten (10) and nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting, either personally or by mail, by or at the direction of the President, the Secretary, or the officer or persons calling the meeting, to each shareholder entitled to vote at such meeting.

3.7 The Board of Directors may fix in advance a date not more than 60 nor less than 10 days preceding the date of any meeting of shareholders, or the date for any payment of dividends, or the date for allotment of rights, or the date when any reclassification or change or conversion or exchange of capital stock shall go into effect, as a record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to vote at any such meeting or entitled to receive payment of any such dividend or to any such allotment of rights, or to exercise the rights in respect of any such reclassification, change, conversion or exchange of capital stock, and in such cases only such shareholders as shall be shareholders of record on the date so fixed shall be entitled to vote at such meeting, or to receive payment of such dividend, or to receive such allotment of rights, or to exercise such rights or to participate in the effect of any such transaction, as the case may be, notwithstanding any transfer of any stock on the books of the Corporation after any such record date fixed as aforesaid. This Bylaw shall in no way affect the rights of a shareholder and his transferee or transferor as between themselves.

3.8 The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation having voting power with respect to a subject matter (excluding shares held by the Corporation for its own account) present or represented by proxy shall constitute a quorum at the meeting of shareholders for the transaction of business with respect to such subject matter; provided, that in the case of a special meeting called by shareholders, the holders of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of the Corporation having voting power with respect to a subject, represented in person or by proxy, shall be required for a quorum. In the absence of a quorum with respect to a particular subject matter, the shareholders present or represented by proxy shall have power by the affirmative role of a majority in voting power thereof to adjourn the meeting from time to time, without notice other than an announcement at the meeting, until a quorum is present with respect to that subject matter. If the adjournment is for more than twenty (20) days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting ten (10) days before the date of such shareholder meeting. At such adjourned meeting, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the meeting as originally notified.

3.9 When a quorum is present or represented at any meeting of shareholders, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the subject matter shall be the act of the shareholders in all matters, unless the matter is one upon which, by express provision of the TBOC, of the Certificate of Formation or of these Bylaws, a different vote is required, in which case such express provision shall govern and control the decision of that matter. Directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors.

3.10 Every shareholder having the right to vote shall be entitled to vote in person, or by proxy appointed by an instrument in writing subscribed by such shareholder (which for purposes of this paragraph may include a signature and form of proxy pursuant to a facsimile or telegraphic form of proxy or any other instruments acceptable to the Judge of Election), bearing a date not more than eleven months prior to voting, unless such instrument provides for a longer period, and filed with the Secretary of the Corporation before, or at the time of, the meeting. If such instrument shall designate two or more persons to act as proxies, unless such instrument shall provide to the contrary, a majority of such persons present at any meeting at which their powers thereunder are to be exercised shall have and may exercise all the powers of voting thereby conferred, or if only one be present, then such powers may be exercised by that one; or, if an even number attend and a majority do not agree on any particular issue, each proxy so attending shall be entitled to exercise such powers in respect of the same portion of the shares as he is of the proxies representing such shares.

3.11 Unless otherwise provided by the Certificate of Formation or by the TBOC, each shareholder of the Corporation shall, at every meeting of shareholders, be entitled to one vote in person or by proxy for each share of capital stock of the Corporation registered in his name.

C-4


3.12 The order of business and all other matters of procedure at every meeting of the shareholders may be determined by the presiding officer of the meeting, who shall be the Chairman of the Board, or in his absence the Chief Executive Officer, or in the absence of both of them such other officer of the Corporation as designated by the Board. The presiding officer of the meeting shall have all the powers and authority vested in a presiding officer by law or practice without restriction, including, without limitation, the authority, in order to conduct an orderly meeting, to impose reasonable limits on the amount of time at the meeting taken up in remarks by any one shareholder and to declare any business not properly brought before the meeting to be out of order.

3.13 The Board shall appoint one or more Judges of Election to serve at every meeting of the shareholders.

3.14Advance Notice of Shareholder Business and Director Nominations.

(a) Annual Meetings of Shareholders.

(i) At an annual meeting of shareholders, only such business, which term includes nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors, shall be conducted as shall have been properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be (a) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, (b) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or (c) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by a shareholder of the Corporation pursuant to thisSection 3.14. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors and other proposals of business to be considered by the shareholders may be made at an annual meeting of shareholders by any shareholder of the Corporation who was a shareholder of record of the Corporation at the time the notice provided for in thisSection 3.14 is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation, who is entitled to vote at the meeting, and who complies with the notice and other procedures set forth in thisSection 3.14.

(ii) For nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting of shareholders by a shareholder, the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in proper written form to the Secretary of the Corporation and any such proposed business must constitute a proper matter for shareholder action under the TBOC. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business on the ninetieth (90th) day nor earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting (provided,however,that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than thirty (30) days before or more than sixty (60) days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than one hundred (100) days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Corporation. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting of shareholders commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above. To be in proper written form, a shareholder’s notice to the Secretary (whether pursuant to thisSection 3.14(a)(ii) orSection 3.14(b)) must set forth:

(A) as to each person, if any, whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election as a director (i) all information relating to such person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to and in accordance with Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, the “Exchange Act”), (ii) such person’s written consent to being named in the proxy statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected, and (iii) a description of all direct and indirect compensation and other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings during the past three years, and any other material relationships, between or among such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, and their respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the one hand, and each proposed nominee, and his or her respective affiliates and associates, or others acting in concert therewith, on the other hand, including, without limitation all information that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 404 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Exchange Act if the shareholder making the nomination and

C-5


any beneficial owner on whose behalf the nomination is made, if any, or any affiliate or associate thereof or person acting in concert therewith, were the “registrant” for purposes of such rule and the nominee were a director or executive officer of such registrant.

(B) if the notice relates to any business (other than the nomination of persons for election as directors) that the shareholder proposes to bring before the meeting, (i) a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting, (ii) the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (iii) the text of the proposal or business (including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend these Bylaws, the language of the proposed amendment), (iv) any material interest in such business of such shareholder and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, and (v) a description of all agreements, arrangements and understandings between such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, and any other person or persons (including their names) in connection with the proposal of such business by such shareholder; and

(C) as to the shareholder giving the notice and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination or proposal is made:

a. the name and address of such shareholder, as they appear on the Corporation’s books, of such beneficial owner, if any, and of their respective affiliates, associates or others acting in concert therewith,

b. the following information:

i. the class or series and number of shares of the Corporation that are, directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and of record by such shareholder, such beneficial owner and of their respective affiliates, associates or others acting in concert therewith,

ii. any option, warrant, convertible security, stock appreciation right, or similar right with an exercise or conversion privilege or a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or series of shares of the Corporation or with a value derived in whole or in part from the value of any class or series of shares of the Corporation, or any derivative or synthetic arrangement having the characteristics of a long position in any class or series of shares of the Corporation, or any contract, derivative, swap or other transaction or series of transactions designed to produce economic benefits and risks that correspond substantially to the ownership of any class or series of shares of the Corporation, including where the value of such contract, derivative, swap or other transaction or series of transactions is determined by reference to the price, value or volatility of any class or series of shares of the Corporation, whether or not such instrument, contract or right shall be subject to settlement in shares of the underlying class or series of capital stock of the Corporation, through the delivery of cash or other property, or otherwise, and without regard of whether the shareholder of record, the beneficial owner, if any, or any affiliates or associates or others acting in concert therewith, may have entered into transactions that hedge or mitigate the economic effect of such instrument, contract or right or any other direct or indirect opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Corporation (any of the foregoing, a “Derivative Instrument”) directly or indirectly owned beneficially by such shareholder, the beneficial owner, if any, or of any affiliates, associates or others acting in concert therewith,

iii. any proxy, contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship pursuant to which such shareholder or such beneficial owner has a right to vote any shares of any class or series of shares of the Corporation,

iv. any agreement, arrangement, understanding, relationship or otherwise, including any repurchase or similar so-called “stock borrowing” agreement or arrangement, engaged in, directly or indirectly, by such shareholder or such beneficial owner, the purpose or effect of which is to mitigate loss to, reduce the economic risk (of ownership or otherwise) of any shares of any class or series of the shares of the Corporation by, manage the risk of share price changes for, or increase or decrease the voting power of, such shareholder or such beneficial owner with respect to any shares of any class or series of the shares of the Corporation, or which provides, directly or indirectly, the opportunity to profit or share in any profit derived from any decrease in the price or value of any shares of any class or series of the shares of the Corporation (any of the foregoing, “Short Interests”),

C-6


v. any rights to dividends on the shares of the Corporation owned by such shareholder or such beneficial owner that are separated or separable from the underlying shares of the Corporation,

vi. any proportionate interest in shares of the Corporation or Derivative Instrument held, directly or indirectly, by a general or limited partnership in which such shareholder or such beneficial owner is a general partner or, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns an interest in a general partner of such general or limited partnership, and

vii. any performance-related fees (other than an asset-based fee) that such shareholder or such beneficial owner is entitled to based on any increase or decrease in the value of shares of the Corporation or Derivative Instruments, if any, including without limitation any such interests held by members of such shareholder’s or such beneficial owner’s immediate family sharing the same household,

c. any other information relating to such shareholder and beneficial owner, if any, that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement and form of proxy or other filings required to be made in connection with solicitation of proxies for, as applicable, the proposal and/or for the election of directors in a contested election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder,

d. a representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business or nomination, and

e. a representation whether the shareholder or the beneficial owner, if any, intends or is part of a group that intends (i) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of the Corporation’s outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or elect the nominee and/or (ii) otherwise to solicit proxies from shareholders in support of such proposal or nomination.

The Corporation may require any proposed nominee to furnish such other information as it may reasonably require (i) to determine the eligibility of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Corporation, including with respect to qualifications established by any committee of the Board; (ii) to determine whether such nominee qualifies as an “independent director” or “audit committee financial expert” under applicable law, securities exchange rule or regulation, or any publicly-disclosed corporate governance guideline or committee charter of the Corporation; and (iii) that could be material to a reasonable shareholder’s understanding of the independence and qualifications, or lack thereof, of such nominee.

(iii) Notwithstanding anything inSection 3.14(a)(ii) to the contrary, in the event that the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors of the Corporation at an annual meeting is increased and there is no public announcement by the Corporation naming all of the nominees for director or specifying the size of the increased Board of Directors at least one hundred (100) days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, a shareholder’s notice required by thisSection 3.14 shall also be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than the close of business on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Corporation.

(b)Special Meetings of Shareholders. At any special meeting of shareholders, only such business shall be conducted as shall be provided for in the notice to shareholders of the special meeting. Nominations of persons for election to the Board of Directors may be made at a special meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected pursuant to the notice to shareholders of the special meeting (1) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or any duly authorized committee thereof or (2) provided that the Board of Directors or any duly authorized committee thereof has determined that directors shall be elected at such meeting, by any shareholder of the Corporation who is a shareholder of record at the time the notice provided for in thisSection 3.14 is delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation, who is entitled to vote at the meeting and upon such election, and who complies with the notice procedures set forth in thisSection 3.14. The immediately preceding

C-7


sentence shall be the exclusive means for a shareholder to make nominations before a special meeting of shareholders (other than matters properly brought under Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act and set forth in the Corporation’s notice of meeting). Subject toSection 3.14(c)(iii), in the event the Corporation calls a special meeting of shareholders for the purpose of electing one or more directors to the Board of Directors, any such shareholder entitled to vote in such election of directors may nominate a person or persons (as the case may be) for election to such position(s) as specified in the Corporation’s resolutions or notice of meeting, if the shareholder’s notice in the same form as required bySection 3.14(c)(ii) shall be delivered to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not earlier than the close of business on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to such special meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the ninetieth (90th) day prior to such special meeting or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement is first made of the date of the special meeting and of the nominees proposed by the Board of Directors to be elected at such meeting. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of a special meeting commence a new time period (or extend any time period) for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above. In addition, to be timely, a shareholder’s notice shall further be updated and supplemented, if necessary, so that the information provided or required to be provided in such notice shall be true and correct as of the record date for the meeting and as of the date that is ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, and such update and supplement shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Corporation at the principal executive offices of the Corporation not later than five (5) business days after the record date for the meeting in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of the record date, and not later than eight (8) business days prior to the date for the meeting, any adjournment or postponement thereof in the case of the update and supplement required to be made as of ten (10) business days prior to the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

(c)General.

(i) Subject toSection 4.2, only such persons who are nominated in accordance with the procedures set forth in thisSection 3.14 shall be eligible to be elected at an annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to serve as directors, and only such business shall be conducted at a meeting of shareholders as shall have been brought before the meeting in accordance with the procedures set forth in thisSection 3.14. Except as otherwise provided by law, the chairman of the meeting shall have the power and duty (A) to determine whether a nomination or any business proposed to be brought before the meeting was made or proposed, as the case may be, in accordance with the procedures set forth in thisSection 3.14 and (B) if any proposed nomination or business was not made or proposed in compliance with thisSection 3.14, to declare that such nomination shall be disregarded or that such proposed business shall not be transacted. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of thisSection 3.14, unless otherwise required by law, if the shareholder (or a qualified representative of the shareholder) does not appear at the annual or special meeting of shareholders of the Corporation to present a nomination or proposed business, such nomination shall be disregarded and such proposed business shall not be considered, notwithstanding that proxies in respect of such vote may have been received by the Corporation. For purposes of thisSection 3.14, to be considered a qualified representative of the shareholder, a person must be authorized by a writing executed by such shareholder or an electronic transmission delivered by such shareholder to act for such shareholder as proxy at the meeting of shareholders and such person must produce such writing or electronic transmission, or a reliable reproduction of the writing or electronic transmission, at the meeting of shareholders.

(ii) For purposes of thisSection 3.14, “public announcement” shall include disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press or comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the Corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13, 14, or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

(iii) Nothing in thisSection 3.14 shall be deemed to affect any rights of shareholders to request inclusion of proposals in the Corporation’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act. Subject to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act, nothing in these Bylaws shall be construed to permit any shareholder, or give any shareholder the right, to include or have disseminated or described in the Corporation’s proxy statement any nomination of director or directors or any other business proposal.

C-8


ARTICLE IV

DIRECTORS AND MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS

4.1 The business of the Corporation shall be managed by a Board of Directors (herein the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) who shall exercise all the powers of the Corporation not reserved to or conferred on the shareholders by statute, the Certificate of Formation or the Bylaws of the Corporation.

4.2 Except as otherwise fixed pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Formation relating to the rights of the holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation to elect additional directors under specified circumstances, the number of directors shall be as fixed from time to time by resolution of the Board adopted by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the directors then in office, provided the number shall be not less than the minimum or more than the maximum number permitted by the Certificate of Formation, provided further that if no such minimum or maximum number is stated in the Certificate of Formation the number shall not be less than three nor more than twelve.

4.3 The directors, other than those who may be elected by the holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, shall be divided into three classes as nearly equal in number as possible, with the term of office of one class expiring each year. The term of office of each director shall expire at the third annual meeting after election of the class to which he belongs. During the intervals between annual meetings of shareholders, any vacancy occurring in the Board of Directors caused by resignation, removal, death or other incapacity, and any newly-created directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors, shall be filled by the vote of a majority of the directors then in office, whether or not a quorum. Each director chosen to fill a newly-created directorship shall hold office until the next election of the class for which such director shall have been chosen. Any directorship to be filled by reason of an increase in the number of directors may be filled by election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders or may be filled by the Board for a term of office continuing only until the next election of one or more directors by the shareholders; provided that the Board may not fill more than two such directorships during the period between any two successive annual meetings of shareholders.

4.4 Subject to the rights of holders of any class or series of stock having a preference over the Common Stock as to dividends or upon liquidation, nominations for the election of directors may be made by the Board of Directors or a committee appointed by the Board of Directors or by any shareholder entitled to vote in the election of directors generally. However, any shareholder entitled to vote in the election of directors may nominate one or more persons for election as directors at a meeting only by following the procedure set forth inSection 3.14 hereof.

4.5 Any director may be removed from office as a director at any time, but only for cause (as set forth herein), by the affirmative vote of shareholders of record holding a majority of the outstanding shares of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote in elections of directors at a meeting of the shareholders called for that purpose. Except as may otherwise be provided by law, cause for removal shall be construed to exist only if during a director’s term as a director of the Corporation:

(a) the director whose removal is proposed has been convicted of a felony by a court of competent jurisdiction and such conviction is no longer subject to direct appeal;

(b) such director has been adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction to be liable for gross negligence, recklessness or misconduct in the performance of his or her duty to the Corporation in a manner of substantial importance to the Corporation and such adjudication is no longer subject to direct appeal; or

(c) such director has been adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction to be mentally incompetent, which mental incompetency directly affects his or her ability as a director of the Corporation, and such adjudication is no longer subject to direct appeal.

C-9


4.6 Regular meetings of the Board of Directors shall be held at such times and at such place or places as the directors shall, from time to time, determine at a prior meeting. Special meetings of the Board may be called by the Chairman of the Board or President of the Corporation and shall be called by either of said individuals upon the written request of any two directors. Special meetings shall be held at the office of the Corporation or at such place as is stated in the notice of the meeting. No notice shall be required for regular meetings of the Board. Notices of special meetings shall be given by mail at least five days before the meeting or by telephone, or electronic transmission in a form specified by each director at least 24 hours before the meeting. Notices may be waived. Attendance of a director at any meeting shall constitute a waiver of notice of such meeting, except where a director attends for the express purpose of objecting to the transaction of any business on the ground that the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. Notices need not include any statement of the purpose of the meeting.

4.7 When all of the directors shall be present at any meeting, however called or notified, they may act upon any business that might lawfully be transacted at regular meetings of the Board, or at special meetings duly called, and action taken at such meetings shall be as valid and binding as if legally called and notified. Members of the Board of Directors may participate in a meeting of the Board by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment to the full extent and with the same effect as authorized and permitted by Texas law.

4.8 One-third of the total number of the members of the Board of Directors (but in no event less than three directors) shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and the acts of a majority of the directors present at any meeting at which there is a quorum present shall be the acts of the Board; provided, however, that the directors may act in such other manner, with or without a meeting, as may be permitted by the laws of the State of Texas and provided further, that if all of the directors shall consent in writing to any action taken by the Corporation, such action shall be as valid as though it had been authorized at a meeting of the Board.

4.9 Directors shall receive such compensation and reimbursement for expenses for attendance at meetings of the Board or of committees thereof and such other compensation as shall be fixed by a majority of the entire Board.

ARTICLE V

COMMITTEES OF DIRECTORS

5.1 The Board of Directors shall establish an Audit Committee and a Compensation Committee, and may establish an Executive Committee, a Nominating and Governance Committee and such other committees as may be established by resolution of a majority of the whole Board. Each of such committees shall consist of one or more members of the Board. Members of committees of the Board of Directors shall be elected annually by vote of a majority of the Board. The Chief Executive Officer shall be an ex-officio nonvoting member of each committee (except the Audit and Compensation Committees) of which he is not elected as an official voting member. With respect to any committee (including the Audit and Compensation Committees) of which the Chief Executive Officer is not an official voting member, the Chief Executive Officer shall be given notice of all committee meetings at the same time notice is given to committee members, and the Chief Executive Officer shall be afforded the opportunity to speak at the committee meeting. Presence of a majority of the committee members (not counting any ex-officio nonvoting members) shall constitute a quorum. Committees may act by majority vote of the voting members present at a meeting. Each of such committees shall have and may exercise such of the powers of the Board of Directors in the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation as may be provided in these Bylaws or by resolution of the Board of Directors. Each of such committees may authorize the seal of the Corporation to be affixed to any document or instrument. The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members of any such committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any meeting of such committee. Meetings of committees may be called by any member of a committee by written notice or notice by electronic transmission in a form specified by each director to all members of the committee and the Chief Executive Officer and shall be held at such time and place as shall be

C-10


stated in the notice of meeting. Any member of a committee may participate in any meeting by means of conference telephone or similar communications equipment. In the absence or disqualification of a member of any committee the member or members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from voting, whether or not constituting a quorum may, if deemed advisable, unanimously appoint another member of the Board to act at the meeting in the place of the disqualified or absent member. Each committee may fix such other rules and procedures governing conduct of meetings as it shall deem appropriate.

5.2 The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors, if one is established, shall consist of not less than three directors. The Executive Committee shall have and exercise the authority of the Board of Directors between meetings of the Board, subject to such limitations and restrictions required by Texas law or as the Board may impose in a resolution duly adopted by the Board.

5.3 The Audit Committee shall consist of not less than two members of the Board of Directors, none of whom shall be employees of the Corporation. The Audit Committee shall be responsible for recommending to the entire Board engagement and discharge of independent auditors of the financial statements of the Corporation, shall review the professional service provided by independent auditors, shall review the independence of independent auditors, shall review with the auditors the plan and results of the auditing engagement, shall consider the range of audit and non-audit fees, shall review the adequacy of the Corporation’s system of internal accounting controls, shall review the results of procedures for internal auditing and shall consult with the internal auditor of the Corporation with respect to all aspects of the Corporation’s internal auditing program. In addition, the Audit Committee shall direct and supervise special investigations as deemed necessary by the Audit Committee.

5.4 The Compensation Committee shall consist of not less than two members of the Board of Directors, none of whom shall be employees of the Corporation. The Compensation Committee shall recommend to the Board the compensation to be paid to officers and key employees of the Corporation and the compensation of members of the Board of Directors. Except as otherwise provided in any specific plan adopted by the Board, the Compensation Committee shall be responsible for administration of executive incentive compensation plans, stock option plans and other forms of direct or indirect compensation of officers and key employees, and each member of the Compensation Committee shall have the power and authority to execute and bind the Company to such documents, agreements and instruments related to such plans and compensation as are approved by the Compensation Committee. In the alternative, the Compensation Committee may authorize any officer of the Company to execute such documents, agreements and instruments on behalf of the Company. In addition, the Compensation Committee shall review levels of pension benefits and insurance programs for officers and key employees.

5.5 The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, if one is established, shall recommend to the Board nominees for election as directors. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee shall consider performance of incumbent directors and shall recommend to the Board whether an incumbent director whose term expires shall be nominated for reelection, develop and make recommendations with respect to the best corporate governance principles of the Corporation, and oversee the evaluation of the Board and management.

5.6 Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of any committee of the Board of Directors may be taken without a meeting if a consent in writing, setting forth the action so taken, is signed by all of the members of such committee.

ARTICLE VI

OFFICERS

6.1 The Board of Directors shall elect a President and a Secretary, and may elect a Chairman of the Board, a Treasurer, one or more vice presidents, including an Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, a General Counsel, a Controller, one or more assistant secretaries and assistant treasurers, and such other officers as the Board of Directors shall deem appropriate. The Chairman of the Board shall be a director of the Corporation. Other officers need not be directors.

C-11


6.2 Officers of the Corporation shall hold office until their successors are chosen and qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal. Any officer, agent or employee may be removed at any time, with or without cause, by the Board but such removal shall be without prejudice to the contractual rights, if any, of the person so removed. Election or appointment of an officer or agent shall not of itself create contract rights. Vacancy occurring in any office or position at any time may be filled by the Board. All officers, agents and employees of the Corporation shall respectively have such authority and perform such duties in the conduct and management of the Corporation as may be delegated by the Board of Directors or by these Bylaws.

6.3 Officers shall receive such compensation as may from time to time be determined by the Board of Directors. Agents and employees shall receive such compensation as may from time to time be determined by the Chief Executive Officer.

6.4 The Chairman of the Board, if one is elected, may preside, or may direct that the President so preside, at all meetings of the shareholders and at all meetings of the directors. In the absence of the Chairman of the Board, or if no Chairman of the Board is elected, the President shall so preside.

6.5 The President shall be the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, supervising and directing the operations of the business of the Corporation in accordance with the policies determined by the Board of Directors.

6.6 A Vice President, if one is elected, in the absence or incapacity of the President, shall perform the duties of the President. If there be more than one Vice President, the Board of Directors shall designate the Vice President who is to perform the duties of the President in the event of his absence or incapacity. Each Vice President shall have such other duties and authority as shall be assigned by the Chief Executive Officer or may be delegated by the Board of Directors. The Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, if one is elected, shall be responsible for and direct, either directly or indirectly through any Treasurer, Controller or Director of Data Processing of the Corporation, all treasury, accounting, cost and budgeting, and data collection functions. He will report directly to the President with a report and policy relationship to the Chairman of the Board and the Board of Directors.

6.7 The Secretary shall attend all meetings of the Board of Directors and all meetings of shareholders and shall record all votes and minutes from all proceedings in a book to be kept for that purpose. The Secretary shall keep in safe custody the seal of the Corporation and affix the same to any instrument requiring it, and when so affixed, it shall be attested by his signature or by the signature of the Treasurer or an Assistant Secretary; provided, however, that the affixing of the seal of the Corporation to any document or instrument specifically shallnot be required in order for such document or instrument to be binding on or the official act of the Corporation, and the signature of any authorized officer, without the seal of the Corporation, shall be sufficient for such purposes. The Secretary shall perform such other duties and have such other authorities as are delegated to such person by the Board of Directors.

6.8 The Treasurer, if one is elected, shall be responsible for the care and custody of all funds and other financial assets, taxes, corporate debt, order entry and sales invoicing including credit memos, credit and collection of accounts receivable, cash receipts, and the banking and insurance functions of the Corporation. Such person shall report directly to and perform such other duties as shall be assigned by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, if one is elected, or otherwise the President.

6.9 The Controller, if one is elected, shall be responsible for the installation and supervision of all general accounting records of the Corporation, preparation of financial statements and the annual and operating budgets and profit plans, continuous audit of accounts and records of the Corporation, preparation and interpretation of statistical records and reports, taking and costing of all physical inventories and administering the inventory levels, supervision of accounts payable and cash disbursements function and hourly and salary payrolls. Such person shall report directly to and perform such other functions as shall be assigned him by the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, if one is elected, or otherwise the President.

C-12


ARTICLE VII

BANKING, CHECKS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS

7.1 The Board of Directors shall by resolution designate the bank or banks in which the funds of the Corporation shall be deposited, and such funds shall be deposited in the name of the Corporation and shall be subject to checks drawn as authorized by resolution of the Board of Directors.

7.2 The Board of Directors may in any instance designate the officers and agents who shall have authority to execute any contract, conveyance, or other instrument on behalf of the Corporation; or may ratify or confirm any execution. When the execution of any instrument has been authorized without specification of the executing officer or agents, the Chairman of the Board, if designated as the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, President or any Vice President, and the Secretary or Assistant Secretary or Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer may execute the same in the name and on behalf of the Corporation and may affix the corporate seal thereto; provided, however, that the affixing of the seal of the Corporation to any document or instrument specifically shallnot be required in order for such document or instrument to be binding on or the official act of the Corporation, and the signature of any authorized officer, without the seal of the Corporation, shall be sufficient for such purposes.

ARTICLE VIII

FISCAL YEAR

8.1 The fiscal year of the Corporation shall begin on the first day of October and end on the thirtieth day of September.

ARTICLE IX

BOOKS AND RECORDS

9.1 The proper officers and agents of the Corporation shall keep and maintain such books, records and accounts of the Corporation’s business and affairs and such stock ledgers and lists of shareholders as the Board of Directors shall deem advisable and as shall be required by the laws of the State of Texas or other states or jurisdictions empowered to impose such requirements.

ARTICLE X

INDEMNIFICATION

10.1 Each director or officer of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved in any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director or officer of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the Corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the Corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the TBOC, (but, in the case of any such amendment, only to the extent that such amendment permits the Corporation to provide broader indemnification rights than said law permitted the Corporation to provide prior to such amendment), against all expenses, (including attorneys’ fees),

C-13


judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators. The right to indemnification conferred in this Section shall be a contract right in consideration of a director’s service to the Corporation and may be relied upon by a director as consideration for such director’s service, and shall include the right to be paid by the Corporation the expenses incurred in defending any such proceeding in advance of its final disposition; provided, however, that, if the TBOC requires, the payment of such expenses incurred by a director or officer in his or her capacity as a director or officer (and not in any other capacity in which service was or is rendered by such person while a director or officer, including, without limitation, service to an employee benefit plan) in advance of the final disposition of a proceeding, shall be made only upon delivery to the Corporation of an undertaking, by or on behalf of such director or officer, to repay all amounts so advanced if it shall ultimately be determined that such director or officer is not entitled to be indemnified under the applicable provisions of the TBOC. The Corporation may, by action of its Board of Directors, provide indemnification to employees and agents of the Corporation or a subsidiary of the Corporation with the same scope and effect as the foregoing indemnification of directors and officers.

10.2 The indemnification and advancement of expenses provided in this Article X, shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under any agreement, vote of shareholders, vote of disinterested directors, insurance arrangement or otherwise, both as to action in his or her official capacity and as to action in another capacity.

ARTICLE XI

AMENDMENTS

11.1 Except as otherwise provided in the Certificate of Formation, these Bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed and new Bylaws may be adopted at any regular meeting of the shareholders or Board of Directors; or at any special meeting of the shareholders or Board of Directors; provided that notice of such proposed making, alteration or repeal be included in the notice of such special meeting. The Board of Directors may take such action by the vote of two-thirds of those Directors present and voting at a meeting where a quorum is present. Subject to applicable provisions of the Certificate of Formation, the shareholders may make new Bylaws, or adopt, alter, amend, or repeal Bylaws adopted by either the shareholders or the Board of Directors by the affirmative vote of the holders of not less than two-thirds of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation then entitled to vote generally in the election of directors.

C-14


 

LOGO

 

 

Proxy - Geospace Technologies Corporation

 

 

This Proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors.

Proxy – SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders – August [    ], 2013February 12, 2015

The undersigned holder of common stock of Geospace Technologies Corporation (“GEOS”) hereby appoints Gary D. OwensWilliam H. Moody and Thomas T. McEntire,L. Davis, Ph.D., or either of them, proxies of the undersigned with full power of substitution, to vote at the SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders of GEOSGeospace Technologies Corporation to be held at 9:00 a.m. on August [    ], 2013,the 12th of February 2015, at the GEOS corporate headquarters at 7007 Pinemont Drive,Crowne Plaza Houston Northwest Brookhollow, 12801 Northwest Freeway, Houston, Texas 77040-6601,77040, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, the number of votes that the undersigned would be entitled to cast if personally present.

In their discretion, the above named proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof and upon matters incident to the conduct of the meeting.

This proxy when properly executed will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned stockholder.If no direction is made, this proxy will be voted (i) FOR the amendmentelection of the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan anddirector nominees named on the reverse side, or if any one or more of the nominees becomes unavailable, FOR another nominee or other nominees to be selected by the Board of Directors, (ii) FOR the ratification of certain stock options issued under the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan.appointment by the audit committee of the Board of Directors of BDO USA, LLP, independent public accountants, as our auditors for the year ending September 30, 2015, (iii) FOR the approval of the non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, and (iv) FOR the approval of the reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas.

Please mark, sign, date and return in the enclosed envelope, which requires no postage if mailed in the United States. In order for your vote to be submitted by proxy, you must (i) properly complete the Internet voting instructions or telephone voting instructions no later than 11:59 p.m. Houston time on August [    ], 2013,February 11, 2015 or (ii) properly complete and return this proxy card at or prior to the SpecialAnnual Meeting of Stockholders on August [    ], 2013.February 12, 2015.

DO NOT RETURN YOUR PROXY CARD IF YOU ARE VOTING BY INTERNET OR TELEPHONE.

(continued and to be signed on other side)


Geospace Technologies Corporation

 

  [Name]    
  [Address]    

Using ablack ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in

this example. Please do not write outside of the designated areas

 x 

 

 

SpecialAnnual Meeting Proxy Card

 

 

[A] Other Matters- The BoardElection of Directors recommends a voteFORproposals 1 and 2.

 

1. The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORthe listed nominees:
ForWithhold
A. Tina M. Langtry¨¨
B. Michael J. Sheen¨¨
C. Charles H. Still¨¨

[B] Other Matters

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFORthe following matters:
   For  Against  Abstain
1.2. To Amendratify the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option Plan to Extend its Termappointment by the audit committee of the Board of Directors of BDO USA, LLP, independent public accountants, as the Company’s auditors for the year ending September 30, 2015.  ¨  ¨  ¨
2.3. To Ratifyapprove the Grantfollowing non-binding, advisory resolution: “RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve the compensation of Certain Stock Options Issued under the 1997 Key Employee Stock Option PlanCompany’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s 2015 proxy statement pursuant to the disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related discussion).”¨¨¨
4. To approve the reincorporation of the Company from the State of Delaware to the State of Texas.  ¨  ¨  ¨

[B]C] Non-voting items

 

Change of address– Please print your new

address below

  Comments – Please print your comments below Meeting Attendance
     Mark the box to the right if you plan to attend the SpecialAnnual Meeting 

 

¨

      

[C]D] Authorized Signatures – Sign Here – This section must be completed for your instructions to be executed.

NOTE: Please sign your name(s) EXACTLY as your name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. All joint holders must sign. When signing as attorney, trustee, executor, administrator, guardian or corporate officer, please provide your FULL title.

 

Signature 1 – Please keep signature within the box  Signature 2 – Please keep signature within the box 
     
  
     

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy)   

 

            /                 /